Well, that's terrible news for Nicholle and the whole family. Hopefully they get a promising outlook and things go as well as they can. I can't imagine having to go about everyday life with this hanging over you like a dark cloud.
GM Hockey
wprager wrote:I've been saying for a while: we were top-9 in the league in scoring and 30th in giving up shots on goal, so why would anyone be picking our defensemen ahead of our forwards? If Anderson is left unprotected (unlikely, given how the backups have performed) he might be taken, but the most likely is a forward.
MarkStone wrote:wprager wrote:I've been saying for a while: we were top-9 in the league in scoring and 30th in giving up shots on goal, so why would anyone be picking our defensemen ahead of our forwards? If Anderson is left unprotected (unlikely, given how the backups have performed) he might be taken, but the most likely is a forward.
That is poor logic. None of the players who contributed to that scoring will be available to be picked.
Have you tried to do a mock draft for the expansion? I suggest using the caphit site. You will likely see that there are much better admen that will have to go unprotected. Not only that, they won't have 6 D men that are caliber top 6. Your logic about reaching the cap floor might be off a bit. There are plenty of contracts that will help them in that depeartment. I don't think it's about reaching the floor. Theres gonna be at least 7 bodies that will have to be picked that will start at the AHL for them and they'll have to pick them somewhere.MarkStone wrote:It's not likely a forward is taken. If it's methot vs a forward, there isn't a forward who is close to him in value. Unless they already have 6 d better than methot.
Also, they need to reach the cap floor. They will need to pick some expensive contracts.
If I was them I wouldn't go after bishop. Tampa is pretty much Cussed. They will lose a forward. And a fairly good one at that.wprager wrote:MarkStone wrote:wprager wrote:I've been saying for a while: we were top-9 in the league in scoring and 30th in giving up shots on goal, so why would anyone be picking our defensemen ahead of our forwards? If Anderson is left unprotected (unlikely, given how the backups have performed) he might be taken, but the most likely is a forward.
That is poor logic. None of the players who contributed to that scoring will be available to be picked.
And none of the defensemen *not* responsible for the play inside our blue line would be, either. It's not poor logic. Is it watertight? Of course not. But I would be surprised if a D-man gets picked. Anderson would be the one I'd go after. A goalie who can still be the #1 for the remaining years of his contract, who will be an excellent mentor for a younger goalie, and whose contract is still fairly cap-friendly.
Of course if they are still struggling to reach the floor (unlikely, IMO) then they would be more likely to go after Fleury or Bishop. There are plenty of decent, if overpaid, players in this league that will be left unprotected. Don't think Vegas will have a hard time reaching the floor.
You want a 5 mill d man as a 7 or 8th Dman? Unlikely. I think you are overestimating how much cap room they will haveMarkStone wrote:There wouldn't be 8 better d than methot. I don't see much chance of him going unclaimed.
If they really want dzingel or lazar. Sure go ahead. Not a big loss unless dzingel has a huge year. We need room for white and brown anyway
youre underestimating. There's best players will have 5 or 4 million dollar contracts. They will be a terrible team and won't be close to the capFlo The Action wrote:You want a 5 mill d man as a 7 or 8th Dman? Unlikely. I think you are overestimating how much cap room they will haveMarkStone wrote:There wouldn't be 8 better d than methot. I don't see much chance of him going unclaimed.
If they really want dzingel or lazar. Sure go ahead. Not a big loss unless dzingel has a huge year. We need room for white and brown anyway
I still think they won't be loading up on 5 mill players with history of injury to fill the 6 to 8 spot.MarkStone wrote:Methot is far better than Ericsson so that's one tick in then methot column . Ericsson is a bottom pair d
Bishop won't be aviable because he's being traded
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum