All things 2014 Playoffs

Bergeron is just a good as toews but never gets the recognition

Ev wrote:Bergeron is just a good as toews but never gets the recognition

Love Bergeron too... still take Toews though.

tim1_2 wrote:No, you're not right.

How about now?

NEELY wrote:

Ev wrote:Bergeron is just a good as toews but never gets the recognition

Love Bergeron too... still take Toews though.

Pardon me but I don't think it's that close between those two.

wprager wrote:

NEELY wrote:

Ev wrote:Bergeron is just a good as toews but never gets the recognition

Love Bergeron too... still take Toews though.

Pardon me but I don't think it's that close between those two.  

Imagine bergeron on Chicago. Then tell me.

Ev wrote:

wprager wrote:

NEELY wrote:

Ev wrote:Bergeron is just a good as toews but never gets the recognition

Love Bergeron too... still take Toews though.

Pardon me but I don't think it's that close between those two.  

Imagine bergeron on Chicago. Then tell me.

Playing 1LC in the West? He'd have a lot more 10-game seasons.

wprager wrote:

Ev wrote:

wprager wrote:

NEELY wrote:

Ev wrote:Bergeron is just a good as toews but never gets the recognition

Love Bergeron too... still take Toews though.

Pardon me but I don't think it's that close between those two.  

Imagine bergeron on Chicago. Then tell me.

Playing 1LC in the West?  He'd have a lot more 10-game seasons.

Makes a whole lot of sense

on that note I haven't heard about a concussion, or a ton of suspension talk, in months. Finally.

Ev wrote:on that note I haven't heard about a concussion, or a ton of suspension talk, in months. Finally.

Until game 4 in the Minny-Chicago series.. That's when Matt Cooke comes back into the lineup. The Hawks had better win tonight to go up 3-0.. if Cooke is back to target their good players in the next game...

Ev wrote:on that note I haven't heard about a concussion, or a ton of suspension talk, in months. Finally.

David Backes might disagree. Although he probably doesn't know how long it's been so maybe he'd believe your "months".

F the habs.

Lucky pricks

So much for solving Price... dumbass comments.

Well they were right. They just did it again.

Ev wrote:Lucky pricks

The lucky pricks have held 2 or 3 goal leads in each game. Maybe it's Boston that are the lucky pricks for pulling out as in in game 2. So much for the predictions that they'll lose for in a row.

Seriously, Boston could easily be down 0-3.

wprager wrote:

Ev wrote:Lucky pricks

The lucky pricks have held 2 or 3 goal leads in each game.   Maybe it's Boston that are the lucky pricks for pulling out as in in game 2.  So much for the predictions that they'll lose for in a row.

Seriously, Boston could easily be down 0-3.

and Montreal could be down 1-2 really.

It's 2-1. Ifs and buts are cheap

Ev wrote:

wprager wrote:

Ev wrote:Lucky pricks

The lucky pricks have held 2 or 3 goal leads in each game.   Maybe it's Boston that are the lucky pricks for pulling out as in in game 2.  So much for the predictions that they'll lose for in a row.

Seriously, Boston could easily be down 0-3.

and Montreal could be down 1-2 really.

It's 2-1. Ifs and buts are cheap

You're sounding foolish right now. One team has come out and was ahead 2-0, 3-1 and 3-0. Which do you think is a more likely "could"? The Bruins are *lucky* they are not down 0-3 because they were good enough to take advantage of the chances they had when they were down 1-3, but the reality that they are fortunate to not be down 0-3 is very much a fact. You'd figure after surviving being down 1-4 themselves in the third that the Habs would know better than to ease up and try to hold a lead (especially about the best 3rd period team). Well now they know first-hand.

Well the Bruins have had multiple chances that either hit the post or stopped by an incredible Carey Price, so them coming back in the 3rd period is not even close to being luck, it's just them finally capitalizing on their chances.
The Bruins have dominated, by a wide margin, the first 2 games.