Oglethorpe wrote:First off, playoff gates are not all gravy, 35% goes to revenue sharing regardless of team. Second, the 14.5M operating income is prior to taxes, depreciation and interest. The big one is interest, since the Gene has obviously refinanced the team, the team debt is about 130M according to the Forbes report, so between interest and taxes I can see how he loses money. Having said that he also makes other revenue through the building and capital tickets so overall I would estimate he does not lose money on these holdings.wprager wrote:Let's get this discussion back to the off-topic topic.
I spend $100 on my 4 tickets, then pay $12 for parking. Then I spend $20 on food/drinks, of which $10 is net income (being very generous here). I've bought 3 jerseys over 15 or so years, and probably pay for tickets twice a year -- so $130 / 5 / 2 is $13 bucks. Add some other crap (teeshirts, hats, etc.) and that's probably $20, of which at least $5 must be licensing fees that go to the NHL. So all of a sudden my $100 "gate receipt" is actually $127 -- and that does not include TV contract, radio, internet, advertising revenues.
Sens had revenues of $113M in 2012, when they sold out (19,350) 41 home dates at an average ticket price of $58. Gate receipts were roughly (19,350 * 41 * $58), so $46M. They had 3 home playoff dates, so add another $6M? So gate receipts were $52, which is less than half of the total revenue.
Sens are *not* a money losing team. A year ago he said that they don't even have to make the playoffs to break even. Remember what I was saying when Leeder took over for Mlakar. Mlakar was not a CPA; Leeder is. He showed Melnyk how he could field a team that's not necessarily going to win the President's Trophy, and may even miss the playoffs now and again, yet remain cash-positive.
As pretty much all things, this is cyclical. Melnyk's fortunes will either rebound or he'll be forced to sell to someone else (to pay off his debts, if it comes to that). Sooner or later the Sens will be able to spend again.