tim1_2 wrote:Why would you put your boots under another man's bed? Wouldn't you rather put them under your bed? That would be more convenient.
Do you seriously not understand what that means?
tim1_2 wrote:Why would you put your boots under another man's bed? Wouldn't you rather put them under your bed? That would be more convenient.
Sounds like someone needs to spend some time on the Bang Bus...wprager wrote:tim1_2 wrote:Why would you put your boots under another man's bed? Wouldn't you rather put them under your bed? That would be more convenient.
Do you seriously not understand what that means?
shabbs wrote:Heh... then loathe Brunt... that was all his opinion wasn't it? "The Vancouver Canucks... the team Canada forgot..."Michallica wrote:shabbs wrote:How does that video make you loathe them?Michallica wrote:I was FOR vancouver before to be honest, then I saw this video which made me loathe them to the max:
Sounds pretty smug.....and I like how they're trying to make it seem there should be support from the rest of the country but they take jabs at the sens. Diddle that Dung
I almost felt bad for Vancouver fans after watching that... almost...
Heh heh.
wprager wrote:tim1_2 wrote:Why would you put your boots under another man's bed? Wouldn't you rather put them under your bed? That would be more convenient.
Do you seriously not understand what that means?
wprager wrote:When you put your boots under another man's bed it implies you're bedding his wife. Or, maybe, if you *left them* under the bed, you had to run out quickly after being caught in the act.
Hook, line and sinker...tim1_2 wrote:wprager wrote:When you put your boots under another man's bed it implies you're bedding his wife. Or, maybe, if you *left them* under the bed, you had to run out quickly after being caught in the act.
I think it's awesome that I made you explain that.
wprager wrote:When you put your boots under another man's bed it implies you're bedding his wife. Or, maybe, if you *left them* under the bed, you had to run out quickly after being caught in the act.
dennycrane wrote:5-4 Canucks win tonight. Luongo gets yanked, Schneider steals the show.
dennycrane wrote:5-4 Canucks win tonight. Luongo gets yanked, Schneider steals the show.
SeawaySensFan wrote:wprager wrote:When you put your boots under another man's bed it implies you're bedding his wife. Or, maybe, if you *left them* under the bed, you had to run out quickly after being caught in the act.
Unless you're going "Brokeback."
Not that there's anything wrong with that.
tim1_2 wrote:SeawaySensFan wrote:wprager wrote:When you put your boots under another man's bed it implies you're bedding his wife. Or, maybe, if you *left them* under the bed, you had to run out quickly after being caught in the act.
Unless you're going "Brokeback."
Not that there's anything wrong with that.
Please explain, I don't understand.
As for tonight's game, 2-0 Bruins. One of those goals will be an empty-netter (maybe the first one, you never know with Luongo).
tim1_2 wrote:SeawaySensFan wrote:wprager wrote:When you put your boots under another man's bed it implies you're bedding his wife. Or, maybe, if you *left them* under the bed, you had to run out quickly after being caught in the act.
Unless you're going "Brokeback."
Not that there's anything wrong with that.
Please explain, I don't understand.
As for tonight's game, 2-0 Bruins. One of those goals will be an empty-netter (maybe the first one, you never know with Luongo).
tim1_2 wrote:
Please explain, I don't understand.
As for tonight's game, 2-0 Bruins. One of those goals will be an empty-netter (maybe the first one, you never know with Luongo).
tim1_2 wrote:wprager wrote:When you put your boots under another man's bed it implies you're bedding his wife. Or, maybe, if you *left them* under the bed, you had to run out quickly after being caught in the act.
I think it's awesome that I made you explain that.
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum