tim1_2 wrote:It's hard to be mad at your team for winning. Who knew MacDaddy would steal a game?
Did he not steal the one in Tampa as well. Who knew?
tim1_2 wrote:It's hard to be mad at your team for winning. Who knew MacDaddy would steal a game?
Cap'n Clutch wrote:tim1_2 wrote:It's hard to be mad at your team for winning. Who knew MacDaddy would steal a game?
Did he not steal the one in Tampa as well. Who knew?
3rd last is just fine with me. With the way the lotto works the odds are high we'll stay in third.tim1_2 wrote:Cap'n Clutch wrote:tim1_2 wrote:It's hard to be mad at your team for winning. Who knew MacDaddy would steal a game?
Did he not steal the one in Tampa as well. Who knew?
Yep. We need to get rid of this guy, pronto.
Cap'n Clutch wrote:hemlock wrote:I'm getting close. Seriously, are we trying to tank or not? What exactly is this "plan" that Melnyk speaks of?
These meaningless wins are just that. I don't think we'll drop to 4th in the draft, but it's not out of the question.
Even worse, Cussing Nashville looks like they are on their way to a point at least, and Edmonton and Colorado are losing.
This is a watered down version of the late season Leafs surge we are all so fond of laughing at.
To be fair I don't think Melnyk et al. could have anticipated that late round picks Greening and Condra would have such a positive impact. I mean when you are tanking you get rid of the Vets and fill in with rookies and they did that. Anderson was super human and considering his season before his arrival that too couldn't have been expected. This team is relying on Brian Lee, Karlsson, and Hale on the back end and they're also relying on Butler, Greening, Condra, Shannon, and Neil pretty heavily and Alfie is out. What more could they do. They even have Lessard up. Should they have picked up a crappier goalie on waivers? Send Condra and Greening back down because they're too good right now? Find someone else that won't allow Spezza to be over a point a game? Maybe call up Benoit and bench Lee?
Cap'n Clutch wrote:3rd last is just fine with me. With the way the lotto works the odds are high we'll stay in third.tim1_2 wrote:Cap'n Clutch wrote:tim1_2 wrote:It's hard to be mad at your team for winning. Who knew MacDaddy would steal a game?
Did he not steal the one in Tampa as well. Who knew?
Yep. We need to get rid of this guy, pronto.
Larsson and RNH get picked with the first two then we get Landeskog. Regardless of how it goes those three are highly regarded and the Sens will likely be happy with any one of those three. If we some how fall a bit in the Lotto there's still a guy like Strome who is climbing the rankings and looks like a nice guy to have.
hemlock wrote:Cap'n Clutch wrote:3rd last is just fine with me. With the way the lotto works the odds are high we'll stay in third.tim1_2 wrote:Cap'n Clutch wrote:tim1_2 wrote:It's hard to be mad at your team for winning. Who knew MacDaddy would steal a game?
Did he not steal the one in Tampa as well. Who knew?
Yep. We need to get rid of this guy, pronto.
Larsson and RNH get picked with the first two then we get Landeskog. Regardless of how it goes those three are highly regarded and the Sens will likely be happy with any one of those three. If we some how fall a bit in the Lotto there's still a guy like Strome who is climbing the rankings and looks like a nice guy to have.
Doesn't that seem like settling though in Strome's case. Is that really worth winning a few meaningless games now? I'm not trying to sell Strome short here, but he's certainly not my first choice. I would easily take any of the other 3 guys you mentioned over him.
tim1_2 wrote:You don't think the Avs would want Landeskog vs RNH?
Big Ev wrote:Colorado is the worst team, but I think they started this tanking too late and will not pass Edmonton. 5 points is a lot of ground to make up still, no matter how bad they are. Plus they play them twice, so Edmonton's gotta losr at least 1 of those I would assume.
NEELY wrote:Strome is going to be a very good NHL player to be sure... he's right up there with the other two, the gap isn't as big as some think. The guy has all the tools including size and a little grit to go along with it to make hismelf into a fantastic NHL player. Is offensive upside is def better than Landeskog or Couturier.
marakh wrote:NEELY wrote:Strome is going to be a very good NHL player to be sure... he's right up there with the other two, the gap isn't as big as some think. The guy has all the tools including size and a little grit to go along with it to make hismelf into a fantastic NHL player. Is offensive upside is def better than Landeskog or Couturier.
Not saying he's small but he's like 10 lbs heavier than RNH with the same height and RNH plays more physical. I would say Lando is the only one of the 3 that has a size advantage.
Diddle If we don't get RNH I'm really gonna be a disappointed fella even if I like Strome
marakh wrote:NEELY wrote:Strome is going to be a very good NHL player to be sure... he's right up there with the other two, the gap isn't as big as some think. The guy has all the tools including size and a little grit to go along with it to make hismelf into a fantastic NHL player. Is offensive upside is def better than Landeskog or Couturier.
Not saying he's small but he's like 10 lbs heavier than RNH with the same height and RNH plays more physical. I would say Lando is the only one of the 3 that has a size advantage.
Diddle If we don't get RNH I'm really gonna be a disappointed fella even if I like Strome
GM Hockey » Ottawa Senators » GAME DAY: New Jersey Devils @ Ottawa Senators - 7:30pm ET - THU. Mar. 15, 2011
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum