If true this draft is getting worse everyday for me since April
GM Hockey
tim1_2 wrote:Fret not, we'll get a good player at #6 regardless!!
wprager wrote:tim1_2 wrote:Fret not, we'll get a good player at #6 regardless!!
I wonder if it would be easier to move up in small steps, rather than trying to swap a 6 for a top-three. For example, go to the Devils and remind them that they *need* a D-man, while we have no desire to take one. Swap #6 for #4 and throw in one of our 3rd rounders. Or maybe just offer one of our D prospects -- is Wiercioch too much to move from 6 to 4? It's a lot easier moving from 4 into the top 3.
Flo The Action wrote:NNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!
I had hopes that BM would trade up to the 4rth and hopefully Hubie would be available by then. SH!T!
marakh wrote:wprager wrote:tim1_2 wrote:Fret not, we'll get a good player at #6 regardless!!
I wonder if it would be easier to move up in small steps, rather than trying to swap a 6 for a top-three. For example, go to the Devils and remind them that they *need* a D-man, while we have no desire to take one. Swap #6 for #4 and throw in one of our 3rd rounders. Or maybe just offer one of our D prospects -- is Wiercioch too much to move from 6 to 4? It's a lot easier moving from 4 into the top 3.
Not happening
wprager wrote:marakh wrote:wprager wrote:tim1_2 wrote:Fret not, we'll get a good player at #6 regardless!!
I wonder if it would be easier to move up in small steps, rather than trying to swap a 6 for a top-three. For example, go to the Devils and remind them that they *need* a D-man, while we have no desire to take one. Swap #6 for #4 and throw in one of our 3rd rounders. Or maybe just offer one of our D prospects -- is Wiercioch too much to move from 6 to 4? It's a lot easier moving from 4 into the top 3.
Not happening
If the Devils were guaranteed to have the player they want at #4 or #6, why not?
Anyhow, the point I was making is that while it might be difficult to move from #6 up to #3, you could try to do it in two smaller steps. Ever hear of that guy who started with a red paper-clip and traded up to a house?
wprager wrote:marakh wrote:wprager wrote:tim1_2 wrote:Fret not, we'll get a good player at #6 regardless!!
I wonder if it would be easier to move up in small steps, rather than trying to swap a 6 for a top-three. For example, go to the Devils and remind them that they *need* a D-man, while we have no desire to take one. Swap #6 for #4 and throw in one of our 3rd rounders. Or maybe just offer one of our D prospects -- is Wiercioch too much to move from 6 to 4? It's a lot easier moving from 4 into the top 3.
Not happening
If the Devils were guaranteed to have the player they want at #4 or #6, why not?
Anyhow, the point I was making is that while it might be difficult to move from #6 up to #3, you could try to do it in two smaller steps. Ever hear of that guy who started with a red paper-clip and traded up to a house?
hemlock wrote:wprager wrote:marakh wrote:wprager wrote:tim1_2 wrote:Fret not, we'll get a good player at #6 regardless!!
I wonder if it would be easier to move up in small steps, rather than trying to swap a 6 for a top-three. For example, go to the Devils and remind them that they *need* a D-man, while we have no desire to take one. Swap #6 for #4 and throw in one of our 3rd rounders. Or maybe just offer one of our D prospects -- is Wiercioch too much to move from 6 to 4? It's a lot easier moving from 4 into the top 3.
Not happening
If the Devils were guaranteed to have the player they want at #4 or #6, why not?
Anyhow, the point I was making is that while it might be difficult to move from #6 up to #3, you could try to do it in two smaller steps. Ever hear of that guy who started with a red paper-clip and traded up to a house?
Do you really want to spend, say, a 3rd to jump to 4th and then probably a 2nd/3rd to jump into the top 3 somewhere? That really eats away at the depth we'd otherwise come away with at this draft.
sandysensfan wrote:The Sens have 12 picks in this draft. That's about 5 extra picks.
Murray will use them to get what he wants.
hemlock wrote:wprager wrote:marakh wrote:wprager wrote:tim1_2 wrote:Fret not, we'll get a good player at #6 regardless!!
I wonder if it would be easier to move up in small steps, rather than trying to swap a 6 for a top-three. For example, go to the Devils and remind them that they *need* a D-man, while we have no desire to take one. Swap #6 for #4 and throw in one of our 3rd rounders. Or maybe just offer one of our D prospects -- is Wiercioch too much to move from 6 to 4? It's a lot easier moving from 4 into the top 3.
Not happening
If the Devils were guaranteed to have the player they want at #4 or #6, why not?
Anyhow, the point I was making is that while it might be difficult to move from #6 up to #3, you could try to do it in two smaller steps. Ever hear of that guy who started with a red paper-clip and traded up to a house?
It was a giant paper-clip wasn't it?
hemlock wrote:
Do you really want to spend, say, a 3rd to jump to 4th and then probably a 2nd/3rd to jump into the top 3 somewhere? That really eats away at the depth we'd otherwise come away with at this draft.
shabbs wrote:ISS Final Top 6:
1. N-Hopkins
2. Larsson
3. Huberdeau
4. Couturier
5. Hamilton
6. Landeskog
Dare to dream...
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum