I love Hamius and I would pay that with an extension in place, but not for a rental, no shot.
GM Hockey
SpezDispenser wrote:Goodness, Nashville is asking for a 1st rounder AND a scoring winger for Hamhuis. That's insane.
N4L wrote:I love Hamius and I would pay that with an extension in place, but not for a rental, no shot.
SeawaySensFan wrote:SpezDispenser wrote:Goodness, Nashville is asking for a 1st rounder AND a scoring winger for Hamhuis. That's insane.
If those cheap Diddlers wanted a scoring winger, they should have gotten in on the Smeat-stakes... Diddle that pissed me off!
SpezDispenser wrote:SeawaySensFan wrote:SpezDispenser wrote:Seidenberg's price just went down BIG time. He's owed a 1.25 million dollar bonus at the end of the year according to Garrioch. So...a salary dump to Florida or a LATE pick.
We all know what a fine grasp Garrioch has of the "bonus" concept. But given that we're talking "real dollars" here, I say ADVANTAGE = SENS!!!
I'll still take him, but it'll cost nothing more than a 5th. Good? Good. Deal.
N4L wrote:Thaaats pretty steep, I dont know. Depends on the situation. For Ottawa? No, because they cant give up any kind of depth they have up front along with a 1st roudner. Philly? I would give up a guy like Gagne and a 1st for sure.
SeawaySensFan wrote:SpezDispenser wrote:SeawaySensFan wrote:SpezDispenser wrote:Seidenberg's price just went down BIG time. He's owed a 1.25 million dollar bonus at the end of the year according to Garrioch. So...a salary dump to Florida or a LATE pick.
We all know what a fine grasp Garrioch has of the "bonus" concept. But given that we're talking "real dollars" here, I say ADVANTAGE = SENS!!!
I'll still take him, but it'll cost nothing more than a 5th. Good? Good. Deal.
I think Garrioch is overstating what amounts to peanuts in the NHL. If we can steal him on that basis because other teams are too stingy to pay that kind of pocket change, all the better.
SpezDispenser wrote:N4L wrote:Thaaats pretty steep, I dont know. Depends on the situation. For Ottawa? No, because they cant give up any kind of depth they have up front along with a 1st roudner. Philly? I would give up a guy like Gagne and a 1st for sure.
So steep though. So much pain...don't they have Cockburn and Timonen and Pronger and Carle? Shouldn't they be looking at their goaltending once and for all and not their D?
N4L wrote:
Carle is brutal, he's just lucky enough to play with Pronger.
Philly needs all the D they can get with their goaltenders because they goalies that are available are in The East and there wont be anyone willing to make The Flyers a true contender by upgradding their goaltending with the risk of losing to them in the playoffs.
Philly is going with Leighton.
SeawaySensFan wrote:Dallas_Dave says that Brian Jurke is trying to engineer a deal that would land Ponikarovsky in Nashville, Hamhuis in Philly and Hartnell in Toronto.
SeawaySensFan wrote:Dallas_Dave says that Brian Jurke is trying to engineer a deal that would land Ponikarovsky in Nashville, Hamhuis in Philly and Hartnell in Toronto.
SeawaySensFan wrote:Dallas_Dave says that Brian Jurke is trying to engineer a deal that would land Ponikarovsky in Nashville, Hamhuis in Philly and Hartnell in Toronto.
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum