GAME DAY: Boston Bruins @ Ottawa Senators - 7:30pm ET - Mon. Dec. 21st, 2009

SensGirl11 wrote:

SeawaySensFan wrote:

SensGirl11 wrote:

SpezDispenser wrote:

SeawaySensFan wrote:Kuba will be part of a blockbuster deal with EDM.

Swirlings?

Who do you want from that team? Better yet, who can you get from that team for Kuba?

You could probably get Souray as part of a Spezza, Kuba deal.

According to this guy, anyway.

So that's your source!

As good as any.

I find it funny that you guys still call Elliott your "backup" goalie. Elliott will play just as many games as Leclaire this year. Every year Leclaire is in Ottawa, Elliott will play just as many games as Leclaire. You might want to stop covering up Elliott's flaws by saying "its ok, he is only our backup". That may get old real fast for you.

Something something something Dark Side something something something Complete!

cloverleaf wrote:I find it funny that you guys still call Elliott your "backup" goalie. Elliott will play just as many games as Leclaire this year. Every year Leclaire is in Ottawa, Elliott will play just as many games as Leclaire. You might want to stop covering up Elliott's flaws by saying "its ok, he is only our backup". That may get old real fast for you.

I'd agree with you if I didn't think his flaws are acceptable being that he's only our backup.

cloverleaf wrote:I find it funny that you guys still call Elliott your "backup" goalie. Elliott will play just as many games as Leclaire this year. Every year Leclaire is in Ottawa, Elliott will play just as many games as Leclaire. You might want to stop covering up Elliott's flaws by saying "its ok, he is only our backup". That may get old real fast for you.

He is our backup though, sure he'll play just as many games maybe, but it doesn't change the fact that he's our backup I don't recall anyone saying it's okay he's only our backup, I never said it was okay that he sucked when he did.

WTF...weird. I don't know why that came up twice.

SensGirl11 wrote:WTF...weird. I don't know why that came up twice.

He knows:

SeawaySensFan wrote:

cloverleaf wrote:I find it funny that you guys still call Elliott your "backup" goalie. Elliott will play just as many games as Leclaire this year. Every year Leclaire is in Ottawa, Elliott will play just as many games as Leclaire. You might want to stop covering up Elliott's flaws by saying "its ok, he is only our backup". That may get old real fast for you.

I'd agree with you if I didn't think his flaws are acceptable being that he's only our backup.

Brilliant.

cloverleaf wrote:I find it funny that you guys still call Elliott your "backup" goalie. Elliott will play just as many games as Leclaire this year. Every year Leclaire is in Ottawa, Elliott will play just as many games as Leclaire. You might want to stop covering up Elliott's flaws by saying "its ok, he is only our backup". That may get old real fast for you.

Can you PLEASE stop posting like you know this team better than we do. For Diddle's sake. You might notice (if you cared to fact check, which your every post indicates you don't) that Elliott has now played 20 games. You might also notice that he's played 16 of the last 17 games. Furthermore, you might notice that he played 4 games in the first 19 games of the season. That means he played in 20% of the games over the first quarter of the season and has only played in as many games as he has because of injury.

In conclusion, stop acting like you know more about "your 2nd favorite team" than we do about our first...Stop acting like we're just dumb homers and you're somehow the voice of reason. If you had any faculty for critical thinking, without overexaggeration, you would realize that the voice of reason already exists on this site and that it exists in the majority of the posters. You are not one of them.

Oh and before you post some moronic reply about Leclaire's injury history, please consider the nature of it. It was a fluke and does not support your argument that he is not a #1 goaltender.

Gohan wrote:

cloverleaf wrote:I find it funny that you guys still call Elliott your "backup" goalie. Elliott will play just as many games as Leclaire this year. Every year Leclaire is in Ottawa, Elliott will play just as many games as Leclaire. You might want to stop covering up Elliott's flaws by saying "its ok, he is only our backup". That may get old real fast for you.

Can you PLEASE stop posting like you know this team better than we do. For Diddle's sake. You might notice (if you cared to fact check, which your every post indicates you don't) that Elliott has now played 20 games. You might also notice that he's played 16 of the last 17 games. Furthermore, you might notice that he played 4 games in the first 19 games of the season. That means he played in 20% of the games over the first quarter of the season and has only played in as many games as he has because of injury.

Oh, so Elliott has played just as much as Leclaire already...go figure. Thanks for proving my earlier post. Until next time...

SensGirl11 wrote:Something something something Dark Side something something something Complete!

That made my day ... almost.

Gohan wrote:

cloverleaf wrote:I find it funny that you guys still call Elliott your "backup" goalie. Elliott will play just as many games as Leclaire this year. Every year Leclaire is in Ottawa, Elliott will play just as many games as Leclaire. You might want to stop covering up Elliott's flaws by saying "its ok, he is only our backup". That may get old real fast for you.

Can you PLEASE stop posting like you know this team better than we do. For Diddle's sake. You might notice (if you cared to fact check, which your every post indicates you don't) that Elliott has now played 20 games. You might also notice that he's played 16 of the last 17 games. Furthermore, you might notice that he played 4 games in the first 19 games of the season. That means he played in 20% of the games over the first quarter of the season and has only played in as many games as he has because of injury.

In conclusion, stop acting like you know more about "your 2nd favorite team" than we do about our first...Stop acting like we're just dumb homers and you're somehow the voice of reason. If you had any faculty for critical thinking, without overexaggeration, you would realize that the voice of reason already exists on this site and that it exists in the majority of the posters. You are not one of them.

Great post. Kept it nice and clean, without resorting to name-calling.

Cloverleaf, you're just trolling now so, please, stop. You're like my 13-year-old who says things just to stir up trouble. Don't make me take away your laptop!

Apparently Murray has written the league about this being the third time they've drawn zero penalties.

wprager wrote:Apparently Murray has written the league about this being the third time they've drawn zero penalties.

That's a surefire way to have at least 3 more games like that.

Trolling? On a teams board that I follow? Just because my opinion is different? Maybe I don't know the definition of trolling, but that the last thing I see myself as. Oh well...

cloverleaf wrote:Trolling? On a teams board that I follow? Just because my opinion is different? Maybe I don't know the definition of trolling, but that the last thing I see myself as. Oh well...

OK, that's it, you lose your laptop for one day!

One word to describe this game: Lwame.