Camp cuts and other notes

111519 wrote:If yoy were playing on a line with alfie and kovalev and could somehow keep your stick on the ice and stand up, you would get 30 goals. Your body might be covered by bruises from where they banked shots off you into the net but hey...... We should move volchenkov up to forward for this purpose.

N4L wrote:

CCgotITcovered wrote:I was referring to ###....

Why are you still talking pawn!?

CCgotITcovered wrote:

wprager wrote:

CCgotITcovered wrote:

wprager wrote:

111519 wrote:

CCgotITcovered wrote:

111519 wrote:

N4L wrote:

111519 wrote:

BigRig wrote:

N4L wrote:Do you realize who yu are talking to there?

ummmm who's he talking to?

I'm not one of N4L's pawns so my opinions are not as important as his.

I'm just wondering if someone had said two years ago kovalev and cheechoo would be on this team, how many "authorities" would have laughed.

Anyways, back to hockey.......

We playing chess? It's a great game. I prefere to think of everyone as my BlTCH

Now who needs to join reality? Keyboard warriors are hilarious, do you push the keys harder than the rest of us to prove your toughness? Grow up.

seriously: who are you referring to? re: "I'm not one of N4L's pawns so my opinions are not as important as his."

He is referring to me. It's been an ongoing thing. If most people disagee with a comment someone else makes, they politely write a counter argument. If N4L disagrees, you get insulted, ridiculed, and then told the "facts" according to him. It's just something we all live with. He really is a good contributer and I like to read his comments, I just wish he could treat the rest of us with some respect.....

Non, no, no, no, no. CC's point was, if sistu says *he* isnot one of Neely's pawns, then by implication some of *us* are his pawns. Are you suggesting that *you* are one of his pawns? You've disagreed with him, so that can't be the case.

I think CC is just a bit ticked off about the implication that some of the longer-standing members here are pawns of Neely just because we do not argue with him as vehemently.

And if that, really, is the case, then sidstu is really, really far off the mark.

Oh, and:

I was going to let it go, but now that its up for discussion, I want to clarify my question:

It was 111519 that made the pawn comment and yet he didn't seem to understand that my question was directed towards him. Maybe I missed sidstu's comment about pawns...I was referring to ###....

Oh, my mistake. I thought it was sidstu in the first place, and ### was just commenting.


OK, how far out does this message go now, with all the quoted and re-quoted text? Let's see how many quoting levels we can get before we carsh the server

Apparently he just has no desire to confront the question. I'll take that as a pretty straight-forward answer.