KILLER KANE STRIKES!!!
5-2 BLACKHAWKS.
:%%:
5-2 BLACKHAWKS.
:%%:
Round 2 - Vancouver Vs. Chicago
1 | 2 | 3 | T | |
CHI | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
VAN | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
wprager wrote:Boy, am glad I went with 7 games. The Canucks have now lost home ice advantage and momentum. But there's still time to right this ship. Luongo has to play better with the lead and so does the rest of the team. THat said, the Hawks should not be patting themselves on the back too much. In both games they got behind early. Can they continue to dig themselves out of 0-2 and 0-3 holes?
wprager wrote:Boy, am glad I went with 7 games. The Canucks have now lost home ice advantage and momentum. But there's still time to right this ship. Luongo has to play better with the lead and so does the rest of the team. THat said, the Hawks should not be patting themselves on the back too much. In both games they got behind early. Can they continue to dig themselves out of 0-2 and 0-3 holes?
How many three-goal deficits do the Blackhawks think they can overcome in the playoffs? One fewer than they forced themselves into at home in Game 3 on Tuesday. The “at home" part is frustrating. The "three-goal deficit" stuff is inexcusable. The Hawks have fallen behind Vancouver by three goals, two goals and three goals again. The first time, they tied it up before losing the game late. The second time, they scored five in a row to steal a win on the road. The third time, they just blew it. True fact: The Hawks have played 180 minutes vs. the Canucks. They have trailed Vancouver for 112:39 of that. The Hawks had a big crowd and a lot of momentum coming home tied in the series. Even better, they got an early power play. But they would manage only one good chance, and really, that would be it for the period. The Canucks, meanwhile, withstood the usual 10-minute onslaught the Hawks throw at teams in the United Center, and then they took control of the game. Sorry, but it shouldn’t have happened. Not this way. Not at home. Not after a terrorizing comeback in Game 2. Worse, the Hawks didn’t just lose Game 3, they gave it away, making a couple awful plays that led to Vancouver’s first two goals. On the first, Hawks goalie Nikolai Khabibulin gave away the puck in a mixup behind the net. On the second, Patrick Kane took a lazy, selfish penalty 180 feet away from his goaltender late in the first period -- a play that would get him benched in the second period as the Canucks converted on the power play. Seven minutes later, Hawks defenseman Duncan Keith lost the puck in the left circle, and bang, it was 3-0, Vancouver. And bang, the Hawks were stuck again. The Hawks tried to get too fancy, too pretty. They could be accused of trying to put on a show for the home folks. They forgot to shoot the puck. They had just won a big game in which they beat Vancouver goalie Roberto Luongo with one-timers, dekes and rebounds, and now they can’t even remember to shoot the stinkin’ puck? Look, Luongo can be spectacular even when you pepper him with rubber. To not even force him to duck around screens and scramble in the crease is suicide. There was a play late in the second period when Patrick Sharp got loose down the slot on a rush, but Luongo got a shoulder on a shot ticketed for the top left corner. A goal there, and momentum tilts dramatically in favor of the Hawks. Instead, the thing about that one good chance was it showed how effectively the Canucks had taken away the Hawks’ speed they couldn’t handle for most of the first two games in Vancouver by clogging up the neutral zone. This should’ve clued in the Hawks that the Canucks weren’t giving them the room to make plays at top speed. This should’ve prompted the Hawks to chip the puck deep, work the boards, and get the puck to the net. They didn’t figure it out Tuesday. Hope they learn by Thursday. |
1 | 2 | 3 | T | |
VAN | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
CHI | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|