rooneypoo wrote:cash wrote:I'm still pretty against it, even though he's the most aggravating player to watch on this team.COLLAR UP wrote:At this point...I am very much open to the idea of considering trading Spezza at the dealine or draft this year...
not now...as the return will by shipoopy...but deadline deal or draft could score us a nice return...
For those who feel that they would seriously consider trading him before his NTC kicks in: Would you rather trade him sooner than later? Or would you prefer to give him until June 2010 to prove his worth?
We've still got the rest of this season and all of next season to decide. Is it that important to send him elsewhere? Is he that detrimental to the team dynamic? Are people (and notable people, such as the coach of a local OHL team) right when they say that "we'll never win with Spezza on our team"??
I don't ask from a pov that will guarantee an argument one way or the other...I'm simply asking because I can't make up my mind...
I agree that we've got too much money up front, especially with the loonie falling, the economy going to crap, and the cap expected to stagnate or regress in the next 3 years.
I agree, too, that of the big-money contracts, Spezza is the logical choice -- Alfie is the heart and soul of the team, Heatley is a top-5 winger in the league (hands down), and Fisher has that NMC and might not be tradeable anyway with his new contract.
That Spezza is a superstar player who would command a lot of attention and a good return, I have no doubt. People can quote Clark and Wang 'till the cows come home, but when push comes to shove, there are plenty of GMs who will line up for a shot a Spezza.
The problem as I see it, however, is that there are very few people out there who could put together the kind of package we'd need. To trade Spezza, I expect that we'd want to shore up either or D or G, long-term, plus get a suitable replacement at C coming back to us, and perhaps a pick/prospect -- with the players being relatively young and with a few years on their deals, too, (or at least signed at the time of the deal) to make sure we don't lose them right away.
How many teams have a top 6 C to spare plus a #1 goalie OR a #1-2 D to offer? Would Legwand + Suter/Hamhuis (Weber being off-limits, I presume) from NAS cut it (8 or 6.5 mil)? How about Horcoff/Gagner/Cogliano + Gilbert from EDM (9.5 or 6.5mil)? Or M. Koivu + Zidlicky/Backstrom/Harding (Burns being off-limits, I presume) from MIN (about 7 mil max)? Or Brassard + Leclaire from CBJ (about 5 mil)?
I'm just not sure that I see many teams with the assets needed to move in return for Spezza. Most teams who'd want him, would want him because they only have one real top-6 C. Add in the demand for a young, signed, relatively inexpensive G/D, and that's a pretty tall order to fill. Trading Spezza only makes sense if we shore up at least one of our problem areas (G or D), with a replacement C included, for about the same cap hit that Spezza has right now ($7 mil). That won't be an easy demand for other teams to accommodate.
Just tossinjg this out for fun...as watching the sens right now isn't...lol...
To FLA: Spezza (7), Verm (2.763), Lee (1.25), Gerber(3.7) = Total (14.713)
To OTTAWA: Bouw(4.875), Vokoun(5.7), Weiss(3.1) = Total (13.675)
Keeping in mind...Gerbs will come off FLA books next year...and they don't want to lose Bouw for nothing...
Anderson has basically taken over as #1...so Vokoun could be had IMO...
trades like this are never done...but it looks good from both sides...
FLA could throw in Cory Murphy is they still want more slary off the books...he is 850K and another UFA...
crazy...obviously...but...fun yes...