wprager wrote:
Thing is, we're not talking about Olympic sports. A sprinter *has to* go the the Worlds and the Olympics because, without it, he'd never get his mug on a box of Shreddies. NHL players make $450K minimum, and the one who are good enough to be invited to even try out for international competition are making (or about to make) way more than that. International exposure does not equate to a bigger paycheck.
As for the All Star games, those sports (MLB, NHL, NBA) have very long seasons, especially if you go deep in the playoffs. The All Star break is a chance for them to spend time with their families. This is especially true for those with young kids. I believe the ones who say they would attend if it was paid are in the minority.
I agree they are in the minority - perhaps 20% is a high estimate (I've been very cynical lately), but it's certainly at least 5% if not 7-10%.
EDIT: International exposure may not equate to bigger paycheque, but you can't argue that, at least in certain countries, being on the national team does equate to an elevated status, and therefore will lead to some form of either monetary or non-monetary compensation. We saw this in Ottawa - several (I can confirm this) of the Senators had in fact been pulled over for various misdemeanors, but were released by the cops on the spot with just a warning because of who they were. To be fair, it doesn't happen just to hockey players, it happens to MPs, judges, and even high level doctors and lawyers (remember Dr. Keon?) At a national level, the ability to get away with things (and get "stuff") increases. [I'm not referring to drugs as I do not have
any information regarding involvement, nor do I want such information].