That draft was insane. Joe Pavelski in 7th round, Enstrom and Byfuglien in 8th, Moulson in 9th
GM Hockey
Ev wrote:WE HAVE CONACHER WHO DOES THE EXACT SAME THING. THE HABS WERE AFTER HIM ALL SERIES
ddin't mean to caps by the way
SpezDispenser wrote:What are people's predictions for the top 5? I'm not as into the draft as others, but:
1.McKinnon
2. Jones
3. Drouin
4. Barkov
5. Lindholm
Sounds like the easy picks. Mguire mentioned Nurse being a late riser too.
NEELY wrote:Ev wrote:WE HAVE CONACHER WHO DOES THE EXACT SAME THING. THE HABS WERE AFTER HIM ALL SERIES
ddin't mean to caps by the way
Not in the same kind of way. Conacher is a guy that teams hate but can put up with... Hartman is a guy that will do the same thing but turned up about 10 notches and actually inflict some physical punishment. Conacher will never play the game above 185-maybe 190lbs. Hartman will be destroying guys and the other team will be looking over their shoulders at the wrecking ball at 210lbs when full grown. That's a huge difference right there and IMO something that is so important because of the division they play out of.
Just my opinion picking Hartman but he's no where near the same kind physical player as Conacher.
Ev wrote:NEELY wrote:Ev wrote:WE HAVE CONACHER WHO DOES THE EXACT SAME THING. THE HABS WERE AFTER HIM ALL SERIES
ddin't mean to caps by the way
Not in the same kind of way. Conacher is a guy that teams hate but can put up with... Hartman is a guy that will do the same thing but turned up about 10 notches and actually inflict some physical punishment. Conacher will never play the game above 185-maybe 190lbs. Hartman will be destroying guys and the other team will be looking over their shoulders at the wrecking ball at 210lbs when full grown. That's a huge difference right there and IMO something that is so important because of the division they play out of.
Just my opinion picking Hartman but he's no where near the same kind physical player as Conacher.
depends on body type. Can't guarantee that Hartman will gain that much.
like I said I'd be fine with that pick but I'd rather have another type of player than a Matt Cooke type.
Ev wrote:SpezDispenser wrote:What are people's predictions for the top 5? I'm not as into the draft as others, but:
1.McKinnon
2. Jones
3. Drouin
4. Barkov
5. Lindholm
Sounds like the easy picks. Mguire mentioned Nurse being a late riser too.
I see it going down like:
1. Mackinnon
2. Drouin
3. Jones
4. Lindholm (Nashville loves Sweden)
5. Barkov (Carolina probably deals the pick)
NEELY wrote:Ev wrote:NEELY wrote:Ev wrote:WE HAVE CONACHER WHO DOES THE EXACT SAME THING. THE HABS WERE AFTER HIM ALL SERIES
ddin't mean to caps by the way
Not in the same kind of way. Conacher is a guy that teams hate but can put up with... Hartman is a guy that will do the same thing but turned up about 10 notches and actually inflict some physical punishment. Conacher will never play the game above 185-maybe 190lbs. Hartman will be destroying guys and the other team will be looking over their shoulders at the wrecking ball at 210lbs when full grown. That's a huge difference right there and IMO something that is so important because of the division they play out of.
Just my opinion picking Hartman but he's no where near the same kind physical player as Conacher.
depends on body type. Can't guarantee that Hartman will gain that much.
like I said I'd be fine with that pick but I'd rather have another type of player than a Matt Cooke type.
If you are 190lbs at 18 years old and only 5'10... you can bet anything you own when he is at full strength he will be playing the game way North of 200lbs. I do see the Matt Cooke type for sure, you just hope he is a little more composed.
NEELY wrote:After a full season of hockey, 185 is about right if you would normally be walking around at 190. When he's 24, 25 he will be 205-210lbs. Weight is fairly easy to project if there are no growth spurts.
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum