Keep things civil please.
GM Hockey
tim1_2 wrote:I consider that a major f-up, using the old logo. Seriously, seriously bush-league. Whoever is responsible for that foul-up oughta be smacked. It’s ridiculous. It’s not like it’s retro…it’s just…ridiculous.
The rest of the mask is cool, but using that logo is laughable.
SeawaySensFan wrote:tim1_2 wrote:I consider that a major f-up, using the old logo. Seriously, seriously bush-league. Whoever is responsible for that foul-up oughta be smacked. It’s ridiculous. It’s not like it’s retro…it’s just…ridiculous.
The rest of the mask is cool, but using that logo is laughable.
Or it's a retro thing?
Cap'n Clutch wrote:SeawaySensFan wrote:tim1_2 wrote:I consider that a major f-up, using the old logo. Seriously, seriously bush-league. Whoever is responsible for that foul-up oughta be smacked. It’s ridiculous. It’s not like it’s retro…it’s just…ridiculous.
The rest of the mask is cool, but using that logo is laughable.
Or it's a retro thing?
That was addressed here "It's not like it's retro..."
SeawaySensFan wrote:Cap'n Clutch wrote:SeawaySensFan wrote:tim1_2 wrote:I consider that a major f-up, using the old logo. Seriously, seriously bush-league. Whoever is responsible for that foul-up oughta be smacked. It’s ridiculous. It’s not like it’s retro…it’s just…ridiculous.
The rest of the mask is cool, but using that logo is laughable.
Or it's a retro thing?
That was addressed here "It's not like it's retro..."
Unless it is?
tim1_2 wrote:I consider that a major f-up, using the old logo. Seriously, seriously bush-league. Whoever is responsible for that foul-up oughta be smacked. It’s ridiculous. It’s not like it’s retro…it’s just…ridiculous.
The rest of the mask is cool, but using that logo is laughable.
tim1_2 wrote:I consider that a major f-up, using the old logo. Seriously, seriously bush-league. Whoever is responsible for that foul-up oughta be smacked. It’s ridiculous. It’s not like it’s retro…it’s just…ridiculous.
The rest of the mask is cool, but using that logo is laughable.
Hoags wrote:That mask was on short notice over a weekend I believe so it's a bit of a rush job.
I always wondered about this, do the goalies buy these masks with their own money ? I imagine that's the case as they keep them when they switch teams.
maybe contract talks with Anderson are going well, why would he get a new mask now ? I figured he'd stick with the Avalanche mask with the Sens sticker on it til he knew where he'll be playing next year.
Number Twenty Nine wrote:
weren't we quite successful with that logo ? we've sucked since the latest one. just sayin
22_4_ever wrote:No sure what the issue is.
It's not like he's used a logo that was never part of this organization. That would be like someone using the original logo and everyone screaming...
why does it matter...maybe Craig just liked that one better... The mask is his personal property and as such he gets to do with it what he wanted. Remember Emery, they made it clear that it was his mask and they couldn't force him to change it, but they did talk to him about what would be best for the team and Ray.
If he chose to keep the Tyson picture then he could have done so.
Really...this is worth getting upset about..
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum