General Hockey Talk - Injuries, signings, factoids + other news from around the league

marakh wrote:Getzlaf sprained his ankle. So who replaces him in Vancouver?

SpezDispenser wrote:

marakh wrote:Getzlaf sprained his ankle. So who replaces him in Vancouver?

Stamkos please.

SeawaySensFan wrote:

SpezDispenser wrote:

marakh wrote:Getzlaf sprained his ankle. So who replaces him in Vancouver?

Stamkos please.

I love Stamkos. Under-rated physically as well. Very strong in puck battles.

sens4win wrote:

SeawaySensFan wrote:

SpezDispenser wrote:

marakh wrote:Getzlaf sprained his ankle. So who replaces him in Vancouver?

Stamkos please.

I love Stamkos. Under-rated physically as well. Very strong in puck battles.

not to be a nerd here but in NHL 10 he is rated better then crosby

SpezDispenser wrote:

sens4win wrote:

SeawaySensFan wrote:

SpezDispenser wrote:

marakh wrote:Getzlaf sprained his ankle. So who replaces him in Vancouver?

Stamkos please.

I love Stamkos. Under-rated physically as well. Very strong in puck battles.

not to be a nerd here but in NHL 10 he is rated better then crosby

GTFO, really? And I never made a move to acquire him. Tonight will be the night...

sens4win wrote:ya he is cheaper, younger and a high trade value you find these things out when your sick and have nothing to do on this crappy tuesday afternoon

SpezDispenser wrote:

sens4win wrote:ya he is cheaper, younger and a high trade value you find these things out when your sick and have nothing to do on this crappy tuesday afternoon

I won't lie, I play that game on average 1.5 hours per day on the weekdays and a solid 5 hours a day on weekends. It's a sickness!

SpezDispenser wrote:

Hmmm...now what's wrong with this picture?

sens4win wrote:so im not alone, split the time between NHL 10 and call of duty modfern warfare 2

SpezDispenser wrote:Just a taaaad offside.

SpezDispenser wrote:That was the game-winning goal last night as well.

sens4win wrote:

SpezDispenser wrote:

Hmmm...now what's wrong with this picture?

#91 seems to be slightly offside

PKC wrote:You guys must have x-ray vision to be able to see Stamkos' leg through Wellwood's body. I'd have to imagine that the ref standing right on the line with no obstruction has the better vantage point between the lot of you.

But what do I know?

PKC wrote:
You guys must have x-ray vision to be able to see Stamkos' leg through Wellwood's body. I'd have to imagine that the ref standing right on the line with no obstruction has the better vantage point between the lot of you.

But what do I know?

Tuk Tuk wrote:

PKC wrote:
You guys must have x-ray vision to be able to see Stamkos' leg through Wellwood's body. I'd have to imagine that the ref standing right on the line with no obstruction has the better vantage point between the lot of you.

But what do I know?

Not even x-ray vision can see through Wellwood's body...