wprager wrote:Can I at least have that in my title?
You want Post-Whore in your title? What were you like when you were Pre-Whore? cool)
What next for the Coyotes?
wprager wrote:Can I at least have that in my title?
What the hell was going on there? Selling Moyes 1,000 tickets to inflate attendance numbers? Yikes.Unable to meet minimum paid attendance and revenue-growth figures in 2007-08, the NHL docked the team at least $3.6 million, or 25 percent of a full revenue share. This past season, the Coyotes again failed to meet those standards and received a 40 percent cut, or more than a $6 million reduction, according to Shumway.
The NHL last year told the Coyotes to "do whatever they needed to do" to hit the minimum requirements and receive a full share, Shumway said. The team, through an accounting move, then sold Moyes about 1,000 tickets a game and deducted the cost from the millions of dollars in loans he provided the team.
Daly said the NHL, which has contended it has been in control of the team since November, became aware of the situation in January and told the Coyotes to stop.
I realize what they were doing, but that just shows how desperate things are down there...wprager wrote:You need to hit certain ticket sale (not attendance) numbers in order to qualify for the profit sharing handouts. That's why they did that. But, hey, the NHL told them to do anything they could, which is what they did.
I'm sure that's true.. but reading between the lines of "do whatever you need to do" was not too hard.davetherave wrote:According to Shumway, the NHL never told the Coyotes to sell the tickets to Moyes. The decision, again, according to Shumway, was the team's.
ie: when word got out... they had to "put an end to it" to save face.davetherave wrote:Again, from the same Arizona Republic article:
The NHL last year told the Coyotes to "do whatever they needed to do" to hit the minimum requirements and receive a full share, Shumway said.
The team, through an accounting move, then sold Moyes about 1,000 tickets a game and deducted the cost from the millions of dollars in loans he provided the team.
(NHL Deputy Commissioner Bill) Daly said the NHL, which has contended it has been in control of the team since November, became aware of the situation in January and told the Coyotes to stop.
shabbs wrote:they had to "put an end to it" to save face.
davetherave wrote:shabbs wrote:they had to "put an end to it" to save face.
"We didn't walk out on
Pittsburgh, we fought to fix their problems. We're fighting for Phoenix
because of our covenant with the team and the fans there."
Bettman said the league will
eventually look at the possibility of a second team in Toronto: "It's
not something that we've studied. If we're going to either relocate a
franchise ... or we decide to expand, if there's suitable ownership and
a suitable arena situation it's something we're going to have to take a
look at."
The decision to start the Stanley
Cup with games on consecutive nights was made a year ago. "We wanted to
try something different, we wanted to try and build an intense start to
the series," said Bettman.
He isn't concerned that the KHL's
decision to hold a draft including 17-year-olds will affect the number
of players coming to the North America: "This is where the best players
want to be."
I think it's all tied together with his application for ownership, which was done last week.Cap'n Clutch wrote:How can someone who's not an owner, apply for relocation? . Seriously. Doesn't he have to own the team first?
http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/story/?id=280535
GM Hockey » The other NHL teams » Central » Arizona Coyotes » How Much Longer For The Coyotes in Phoenix?
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum