TheAvatar wrote:Is Ryan a better player (all around) than Heatley when we got him?
Hard to say. Heatley's pedigree was much more impressive -- at 21/22 he had a 41 goal, 89 point season, playing for Atlanta, in the "Old NHL." That said his injuries prevented him from being the player he was in Atlanta for us and he relied on his incredible goal-scoring instincts and over-all incredible offensive IQ -- which, it must be said, are greater than Ryan's -- to mesh with Spezza and Alfie to become the best line of the past decade.
Ryan I think brings more of a Rick Nash-type physique and ability to the game and he can individually dominate a shift in a way Heatley couldn't. In that sense he is better "all around" but then as with Nash you question why the numbers aren't higher than they are. With Nash the reasoning was always that he was being held back in Columbus. His numbers for NYR are actually pretty good but it's too small a sample size to judge IMO. With Ryan the story from some Ducks fans has been that he didn't get a lot of prime powerplay time because that was given to Perry, Getzlaf, and Selanne. But some also mention that the effort level you see in the highlight reels isn't always there.
I guess with Ryan you have a player who could be more than Heatley (in the same way as Nash could) but who hasn't fully proven it yet. Hopefully the extra opportunities, the presence of Spezza and especially of Karlsson as a galvanizing offensive force, and of MacLean as a coach can bring him to reach that next level. If not, and he continues to play sometimes in the "Heatley" style (as a complementary player and occasional passenger) then he'll put up numbers but doesn't have quite the shot and goal-scoring instincts to be as good a player as Heatley was.
I still think the trade is worth the risk (especially after having taken Lazar as a Noesen replacement) because Ryan is just 26 and thus potentially a piece you can build around for a long time.