Oh sorry I thought Carkner played the left
GM Hockey
SpezDispenser wrote:I don't wanna move Gonchar anymore. F-ing weird how much better he looks. We need that. Rundblad a full year in the A - or until an injury happens on the right side - I actually agree with that.
However, I don't believe Rundblad has digressed, I think he's looked better and better personally.
rooneypoo wrote:Big Ev wrote:There is zero chance he goes back to Sweden. Skelleftea's GM said not to bother even speculating.
Injury will happen, or a trade, but even if they don't and he's playing well in Bingo, they won't want to keep him down there if he appears ready to take the next step.
I just don't think he will be in Binghamton too long. He'll get comfortable soon, and they'll make room.
Barring a major injury to one of Karlsson, Gonchar, or Lee, I just don't see it in the cards this year for Rundblad. Best case scenario for OTT is that Gonchar rebounds and we can move him in February. That way, Rundblad plays 4-5 months in Bingo, gets some time with the club in the final 2 months, and then has a spot for him next year.
We've waited this long on Lee for him to become serviceable, and it finally looks like he has. Moreover, we have a legitimate need for a defensive, stay-at-home guy on the right, so I don't see him going anywhere. Adding Rundblad to Gonchar and Karlsson makes for a wicked looking D on paper, but probably one that's not as defensively sound as it actually needs to be.
This is, of course, why I've been so mystified with all the 'Rundblad in the NHL this year' talk. I don't see much opportunity for him for that to happen. Not yet, anyway.
Big Ev wrote:All I know is they're not going to keep a guy down if he is ready. They will remove hurdles for him since he is part of the future core. Whether he plays 2 months or 4 months, he'll be an Ottawa Senator at the end of the year, definitely. This is a guy who won't need a full year in the AHL I think.
He can even be used as solely a PP specialist early on. Doesn't need to factor into the right-side left-side debate. They can take their time with him up here as well.
If they do get fed up with Kuba, you insert Carkner into the Top 6 and Rundblad becomes the 7th D.
SpezDispenser wrote:Big Ev wrote:All I know is they're not going to keep a guy down if he is ready. They will remove hurdles for him since he is part of the future core. Whether he plays 2 months or 4 months, he'll be an Ottawa Senator at the end of the year, definitely. This is a guy who won't need a full year in the AHL I think.
He can even be used as solely a PP specialist early on. Doesn't need to factor into the right-side left-side debate. They can take their time with him up here as well.
If they do get fed up with Kuba, you insert Carkner into the Top 6 and Rundblad becomes the 7th D.
I don't trust Carkner to play a different position than he's used to. As someone said, I'd rather Boro if we're gonna bury Kuba (which we won't).
SpezDispenser wrote:20 games in the A, then bring him up as a PP specialist/10 minutes of even strength time taking small minutes away from Gonchar/Lee. That's probably a pretty good idea Big Ev.
rooneypoo wrote:SpezDispenser wrote:20 games in the A, then bring him up as a PP specialist/10 minutes of even strength time taking small minutes away from Gonchar/Lee. That's probably a pretty good idea Big Ev.
Yeah, dress 7 D and 11 forwards. I could see that happening, actually, at least for a while. You can double shift guys like Spezza and Michalek to fill out your 'fourth' line, and we've got young guys who are going to be on and off, and who will need to see the game from the box every now and then.
Big Ev wrote:The forgotten man in all of this is Patrick Wiercioch. Remember him? lol. Probably gets traded soon.
wprager wrote:rooneypoo wrote:Big Ev wrote:There is zero chance he goes back to Sweden. Skelleftea's GM said not to bother even speculating.
Injury will happen, or a trade, but even if they don't and he's playing well in Bingo, they won't want to keep him down there if he appears ready to take the next step.
I just don't think he will be in Binghamton too long. He'll get comfortable soon, and they'll make room.
Barring a major injury to one of Karlsson, Gonchar, or Lee, I just don't see it in the cards this year for Rundblad. Best case scenario for OTT is that Gonchar rebounds and we can move him in February. That way, Rundblad plays 4-5 months in Bingo, gets some time with the club in the final 2 months, and then has a spot for him next year.
We've waited this long on Lee for him to become serviceable, and it finally looks like he has. Moreover, we have a legitimate need for a defensive, stay-at-home guy on the right, so I don't see him going anywhere. Adding Rundblad to Gonchar and Karlsson makes for a wicked looking D on paper, but probably one that's not as defensively sound as it actually needs to be.
This is, of course, why I've been so mystified with all the 'Rundblad in the NHL this year' talk. I don't see much opportunity for him for that to happen. Not yet, anyway.
If Carkner does not figure in the long-term plans of the Senators, does that mean the right-side, shut-down job falls to Lee? Or at least until Gryba can compete for that spot?
Big Ev wrote:The forgotten man in all of this is Patrick Wiercioch. Remember him? lol. Probably gets traded soon.
SpezDispenser wrote:rooneypoo wrote:SpezDispenser wrote:20 games in the A, then bring him up as a PP specialist/10 minutes of even strength time taking small minutes away from Gonchar/Lee. That's probably a pretty good idea Big Ev.
Yeah, dress 7 D and 11 forwards. I could see that happening, actually, at least for a while. You can double shift guys like Spezza and Michalek to fill out your 'fourth' line, and we've got young guys who are going to be on and off, and who will need to see the game from the box every now and then.
No need for double shifting though, we're at the cap floor. Might as well keep 12 F and 7 D, no issues with that I assume.
SpezDispenser wrote:Big Ev wrote:The forgotten man in all of this is Patrick Wiercioch. Remember him? lol. Probably gets traded soon.
No need to trade yet IMO. He's a solid 1 1/2 years away, let him progress, the re-assess.
rooneypoo wrote:SpezDispenser wrote:rooneypoo wrote:SpezDispenser wrote:20 games in the A, then bring him up as a PP specialist/10 minutes of even strength time taking small minutes away from Gonchar/Lee. That's probably a pretty good idea Big Ev.
Yeah, dress 7 D and 11 forwards. I could see that happening, actually, at least for a while. You can double shift guys like Spezza and Michalek to fill out your 'fourth' line, and we've got young guys who are going to be on and off, and who will need to see the game from the box every now and then.
No need for double shifting though, we're at the cap floor. Might as well keep 12 F and 7 D, no issues with that I assume.
You can only dress 18 skaters, dude. NHL rules.
rooneypoo wrote:SpezDispenser wrote:rooneypoo wrote:SpezDispenser wrote:20 games in the A, then bring him up as a PP specialist/10 minutes of even strength time taking small minutes away from Gonchar/Lee. That's probably a pretty good idea Big Ev.
Yeah, dress 7 D and 11 forwards. I could see that happening, actually, at least for a while. You can double shift guys like Spezza and Michalek to fill out your 'fourth' line, and we've got young guys who are going to be on and off, and who will need to see the game from the box every now and then.
No need for double shifting though, we're at the cap floor. Might as well keep 12 F and 7 D, no issues with that I assume.
You can only dress 18 skaters, dude. NHL rules.
wprager wrote:rooneypoo wrote:SpezDispenser wrote:rooneypoo wrote:SpezDispenser wrote:20 games in the A, then bring him up as a PP specialist/10 minutes of even strength time taking small minutes away from Gonchar/Lee. That's probably a pretty good idea Big Ev.
Yeah, dress 7 D and 11 forwards. I could see that happening, actually, at least for a while. You can double shift guys like Spezza and Michalek to fill out your 'fourth' line, and we've got young guys who are going to be on and off, and who will need to see the game from the box every now and then.
No need for double shifting though, we're at the cap floor. Might as well keep 12 F and 7 D, no issues with that I assume.
You can only dress 18 skaters, dude. NHL rules.
I think there's confusion between how many you can have on an active roster vs. how many you can dress in a particular game. Only 20 can be dressed (including two goalies) but you can carry 23 (3 healthy scratches). So you'd definitely need a swing guy as your 7th. We know Carkner can do that;I'm pretty sure Rundblad or Karlsson could do it, too -- that is playing an occasional shift on the 4th line with Spezza.
That would just be so weird.
SpezDispenser wrote:rooneypoo wrote:SpezDispenser wrote:rooneypoo wrote:SpezDispenser wrote:20 games in the A, then bring him up as a PP specialist/10 minutes of even strength time taking small minutes away from Gonchar/Lee. That's probably a pretty good idea Big Ev.
Yeah, dress 7 D and 11 forwards. I could see that happening, actually, at least for a while. You can double shift guys like Spezza and Michalek to fill out your 'fourth' line, and we've got young guys who are going to be on and off, and who will need to see the game from the box every now and then.
No need for double shifting though, we're at the cap floor. Might as well keep 12 F and 7 D, no issues with that I assume.
You can only dress 18 skaters, dude. NHL rules.
Always got that wrong until now. Didn't realize that.
GM Hockey » Ottawa Senators » GDT - Montreal @ Ottawa - Friday, Sep. 23, 7:30PM 456 (Rogers), 22 at 10pm (tape delay)
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum