Ah... I meant Day 1 on the ice.
Semantics.
Semantics.
Go to page : 1, 2, 3, 4
Big Ev wrote:Broken leg, 5-6 weeks
SpezDispenser wrote:Big Ev wrote:Broken leg, 5-6 weeks
He's a lucky guy, so is the team, so are the fans. That's a lot better than what I was thinking it was gonna be (minimum of 10 weeks).
SpezDispenser wrote:Big Ev wrote:Broken leg, 5-6 weeks
He's a lucky guy, so is the team, so are the fans. That's a lot better than what I was thinking it was gonna be (minimum of 10 weeks).
shabbs wrote:If it was a rut, they better fix that ice!
SensGirl11 wrote:Anyone else feel this could be a year of tremendous amounts of injury?
I'm not sure why this is any different, but I have a feeling we'll be seeing a lot of injuries.
From training camp already we have Kuba (semi-serious), Russell (sounds semi-serious), Eller (day to day). Undoubtedly more than that too.
dennycrane wrote:In a Sun article, it mentions that poor ice conditions were a concern in the first skate and work on the ice delayed the start of the practice session where Kuba was injured.
I have thought for years that the ice at SBP was substandard but it was only when Kovalev mentioned it that I first saw a player complain about bad ice at SBP.
Dash wrote:I suppose the Canadian reference can mean that as Canadians, and hockey being a huge part of our culture, that we should know how to produce the ideal conditions for ice. Location has little to do with it. Obviously when the temperature outside is too warm, the air conditioning units inside have to work extra hard to counteract the heat, and also in the warm weather, you can get fog on the ice. In the warmer weather, it is natural the ice will be softer than when it is colder outside.
But Canadians aren't the only ones that deal with weather change. Minnesota is more northerly than most Canadian cities.
Go to page : 1, 2, 3, 4
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum