http://twitter.com/TSNwally
GM Hockey
shabbs wrote:I saw that too... we'll see if it's anything to be concerned about...
SeawaySensFan wrote:shabbs wrote:I saw that too... we'll see if it's anything to be concerned about...
Nah. It's Mighty Mike. You can pretty much pencil him in for 82 games.
SpezDispenser wrote:Geez, we need him pretty bad this year, hopefully he's all good.
There was an article in the Sun yesterday about Fisher called High Hopes that was just a wicked read. I tried to post the link, but it says the link can't be found for some reason.
Someone will post it I'm sure, it's a nice, refreshing take on Fisher - and it's quite candid.
http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/2009/10/01/senators_fisher/[/quote[/url]]shabbs wrote:Word is it's just bumps and bruises for Fish... he'll be in the opener.
[url=http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/2009/10/01/senators_fisher/
Cap'n Clutch wrote:Bah hum bug. You just shot down my idea over in the Schubert re-entry thread.
Seriously I think I've come up with 4 or 5 different theories on it.
SensFan71 wrote:Cap'n Clutch wrote:Bah hum bug. You just shot down my idea over in the Schubert re-entry thread.
Seriously I think I've come up with 4 or 5 different theories on it.
any of them to do with the CIA?
SeawaySensFan wrote:SensFan71 wrote:Cap'n Clutch wrote:Bah hum bug. You just shot down my idea over in the Schubert re-entry thread.
Seriously I think I've come up with 4 or 5 different theories on it.
any of them to do with the CIA?
Or this guy?
Go to page : 1, 2
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum