GM Hockey
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
GM Hockey

You are not connected. Please login or register

GM Hockey » The other NHL teams » General Hockey talk » OHLUND TO TAMPA 7@3.75

OHLUND TO TAMPA 7@3.75

5 posters

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

1OHLUND TO TAMPA 7@3.75 Empty OHLUND TO TAMPA 7@3.75 Wed Jul 01, 2009 12:33 pm

beedub

beedub
Veteran
Veteran

Nice veteran to play with Hedman

2OHLUND TO TAMPA 7@3.75 Empty Re: OHLUND TO TAMPA 7@3.75 Wed Jul 01, 2009 12:41 pm

Guest


Guest

wow, so they snagged him just like that eh? nice

3OHLUND TO TAMPA 7@3.75 Empty Re: OHLUND TO TAMPA 7@3.75 Wed Jul 01, 2009 1:04 pm

PTFlea

PTFlea
Co-Founder
Co-Founder

Seven years?

4OHLUND TO TAMPA 7@3.75 Empty Re: OHLUND TO TAMPA 7@3.75 Wed Jul 01, 2009 1:05 pm

Acrobat

Acrobat
Veteran
Veteran

SpezDispenser wrote:Seven years?

Isn't that a bit long? He'll be good for them, but I'm not sure 3.7x7 good.

5OHLUND TO TAMPA 7@3.75 Empty Re: OHLUND TO TAMPA 7@3.75 Wed Jul 01, 2009 1:09 pm

davetherave

davetherave
All-Star
All-Star

beedub wrote:Nice veteran to play with Hedman

With Ohlund and Hedman the Bolts just got MUCH better on D.

6OHLUND TO TAMPA 7@3.75 Empty Re: OHLUND TO TAMPA 7@3.75 Wed Jul 01, 2009 1:10 pm

PTFlea

PTFlea
Co-Founder
Co-Founder

Acrobat wrote:Isn't that a bit long? He'll be good for them, but I'm not sure 3.7x7 good.

Yeah, it's actually a lot long. It should have been 4.5 X 5 IMO.

7OHLUND TO TAMPA 7@3.75 Empty Re: OHLUND TO TAMPA 7@3.75 Wed Jul 01, 2009 1:14 pm

Acrobat

Acrobat
Veteran
Veteran

SpezDispenser wrote:
Acrobat wrote:Isn't that a bit long? He'll be good for them, but I'm not sure 3.7x7 good.

Yeah, it's actually a lot long. It should have been 4.5 X 5 IMO.

Yeah, given the market, and economy, etc, I'd have pegged him at about 4x4 - by the end, he's going to look a lot better than he really is anyhow since he'll be playing beside Hedman, so any future deal will still be a lucrative one.

8OHLUND TO TAMPA 7@3.75 Empty Re: OHLUND TO TAMPA 7@3.75 Wed Jul 01, 2009 1:17 pm

Guest


Guest

SpezDispenser wrote:
Acrobat wrote:Isn't that a bit long? He'll be good for them, but I'm not sure 3.7x7 good.

Yeah, it's actually a lot long. It should have been 4.5 X 5 IMO.
It basically is that. It's apparantly 22.5M for the first 5 years and 3M over the last two.

9OHLUND TO TAMPA 7@3.75 Empty Re: OHLUND TO TAMPA 7@3.75 Wed Jul 01, 2009 1:33 pm

LeCaptain

LeCaptain
All-Star
All-Star

davetherave wrote:
beedub wrote:Nice veteran to play with Hedman

With Ohlund and Hedman the Bolts just got MUCH better on D.

That quote sounds like Ek talking :^^^^:

10OHLUND TO TAMPA 7@3.75 Empty Re: OHLUND TO TAMPA 7@3.75 Wed Jul 01, 2009 1:36 pm

Guest


Guest

Acrobat wrote:
SpezDispenser wrote:
Acrobat wrote:Isn't that a bit long? He'll be good for them, but I'm not sure 3.7x7 good.

Yeah, it's actually a lot long. It should have been 4.5 X 5 IMO.

Yeah, given the market, and economy, etc, I'd have pegged him at about 4x4 - by the end, he's going to look a lot better than he really is anyhow since he'll be playing beside Hedman, so any future deal will still be a lucrative one.

Economy, smish-schmonomy... This is a cap world, my friend. That .8M is HUGE! This is a much better signing with those two extra years, which are all too easy to get rid of.

11OHLUND TO TAMPA 7@3.75 Empty Re: OHLUND TO TAMPA 7@3.75 Wed Jul 01, 2009 1:38 pm

Guest


Guest

davetherave wrote:
beedub wrote:Nice veteran to play with Hedman

With Ohlund and Hedman the Bolts just got MUCH better on D.

Seriously. Ohlund, Mez, Ranger, Hedman is a really solid top-4 for a team with Lecavalier, St. Louis, Stamkos, Malone up front.

Assuming things work out alright for them and they don't suffer a ridiculous string of injuries, then we're looking a playoff team in Tampa in 09-10.

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

GM Hockey » The other NHL teams » General Hockey talk » OHLUND TO TAMPA 7@3.75

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum