GAME DAY: Florida Panthers @ Ottawa Senators - 7:30pm Dec. 8th, 2008

What the Diddle is with giving up the tying goal every time? Wake the Diddle up!

Every elite goalies have tough games when they play 11 in a row. Maybe the offence will have to win a game for a change.

We don't want anyone to hit J Bo too hard.

Alfie has 2 goalposts and Heatley and Spezza have a goal each. I guess the top line is getting their chances. But getting outshot 19-9 in the second? Man, they still haven't waken up.

The way Anderson's playing they should be shooting from everywhere.

alright guys, just got home from xmas shopping. How has OTT
played so far. From the sounds of it on the radio they keep
giving up goals right after scoring again. Any weak goals on Auld?

What happened tonight? How did we lose this game?

There goes Picard's no PIM streak. And our undefeated in black streak. damn.

Disappointing. Definitely a winnable game, unfortunately we caught some bad breaks and some bad reffing.

I didn't think we played all that well though.

Auld needs a break.

Auld is tired, Neutral zone was a mess, battles lost all over the boards... A crappy effort like seen too many times this season.
Waht really is starting to scare me is everytime i have a bad feelign before a game, we lose, and the other way applies also

That was uuuuuuuuuugly.

Were those non-calls really that bad? I was listening to the game on the radio.

IMO they played a great OT, though, despite giving up the goal.

EDIT: Plus at least Heatley got his 500th career point.

PKC wrote:Were those non-calls really that bad? I was listening to the game on the radio.

Yeah they were pretty bad because it was like 3-4 in a row.
But we didn't deserve the win, and they should be happy they got 1 point...

We dont have a shot against the Hawks. That is going to be an ugly, ugly game. If the Sens keep it close I will be shocked.

Neely4Life wrote:We dont have a shot against the Hawks. That is going to be an ugly, ugly game. If the Sens keep it close I will be shocked.

That's the spirit! :D

asq2 wrote:

Neely4Life wrote:We dont have a shot against the Hawks. That is going to be an ugly, ugly game. If the Sens keep it close I will be shocked.

That's the spirit! :D

They are playing a complete team, with a good offense, good defense, in a better conferance. I'm realistic, I dont expect the Sens to even be close on Wed night.

Neely4Life wrote:We dont have a shot against the Hawks. That is going to be an ugly, ugly game. If the Sens keep it close I will be shocked.

I'll take that bet, any day.

That's a porous D, with shaky goaltending at best, in CHI. Toews and Kane are going, I admit, but they don't have me overly concerned. Someone's got to keep our big line in check, and I don't see any impressive checkers on that team, let alone any great shutdowns D after Keith.

I expect another close game in CHI, to be honest, especially after the sloppy game we played tonight.

rooneypoo wrote:

Neely4Life wrote:We dont have a shot against the Hawks. That is going to be an ugly, ugly game. If the Sens keep it close I will be shocked.

I'll take that bet, any day.

That's a porous D, with shaky goaltending at best, in CHI. Toews and Kane are going, I admit, but they don't have me overly concerned. Someone's got to keep our big line in check, and I don't see any impressive checkers on that team, let alone any great shutdowns D after Keith.

I expect another close game in CHI, to be honest, especially after the sloppy game we played tonight.

They get last change and have two lines who can score, a 3rd who can put it in too, and a solid 4th line. I watch Chicago as much as I watch Ottawa aside from being there, Ottawa will be lucky to be in the game after the first the way they are playing, and Auld being so tired. Wed night could be an extremely long night for the Sens, especially since Chicago is still stinging from that Detroit game.

I can basically tell you exactly what is going on inside that Chicago locker room and right now this might be the worst possible time for the Sens to play them.