I’m stunned that no one took a shot at sprong or Ho sang. Bad reputation or not. Try him for a few games and re waive if you don’t like him. He gets sent back to their original AHL teams.
GM Hockey
Flo The Action wrote:I’m stunned that no one took a shot at sprong or Ho sang. Bad reputation or not. Try him for a few games and re waive if you don’t like him. He gets sent back to their original AHL teams.
Lagoon wrote:Flo The Action wrote:I’m stunned that no one took a shot at sprong or Ho sang. Bad reputation or not. Try him for a few games and re waive if you don’t like him. He gets sent back to their original AHL teams.
Me too. Ottawa has no excuse with only 49 contracts. I don’t get them at all. Even if they just try and re-unite Sprong with Chlapik for a couple games during or after the waiver GP limits. Frustration with them continues while Carolina, Rangers, Detroit and Colorado make all the right moves.
Lagoon wrote:Flo The Action wrote:I’m stunned that no one took a shot at sprong or Ho sang. Bad reputation or not. Try him for a few games and re waive if you don’t like him. He gets sent back to their original AHL teams.
Me too. Ottawa has no excuse with only 49 contracts. I don’t get them at all. Even if they just try and re-unite Sprong with Chlapik for a couple games during or after the waiver GP limits. Frustration with them continues while Carolina, Rangers, Detroit and Colorado make all the right moves.
tim1_2 wrote:Lagoon wrote:Flo The Action wrote:I’m stunned that no one took a shot at sprong or Ho sang. Bad reputation or not. Try him for a few games and re waive if you don’t like him. He gets sent back to their original AHL teams.
Me too. Ottawa has no excuse with only 49 contracts. I don’t get them at all. Even if they just try and re-unite Sprong with Chlapik for a couple games during or after the waiver GP limits. Frustration with them continues while Carolina, Rangers, Detroit and Colorado make all the right moves.
When you have EVERY TEAM IN THE LEAGUE passing on these guys, there are pretty valid reasons.
Lagoon wrote:tim1_2 wrote:Lagoon wrote:Flo The Action wrote:I’m stunned that no one took a shot at sprong or Ho sang. Bad reputation or not. Try him for a few games and re waive if you don’t like him. He gets sent back to their original AHL teams.
Me too. Ottawa has no excuse with only 49 contracts. I don’t get them at all. Even if they just try and re-unite Sprong with Chlapik for a couple games during or after the waiver GP limits. Frustration with them continues while Carolina, Rangers, Detroit and Colorado make all the right moves.
When you have EVERY TEAM IN THE LEAGUE passing on these guys, there are pretty valid reasons.
Disagree and so does the waiver priority rules that are in place to help the worst teams improve their roster before teams that don’t need too because they are already good and presumably have depth.
PTFlea wrote:I wouldn't bother adding any of those guys right now, we're chalk full of fringe NHLers, we don't need more - especially that have baggage. Although Duclair's about to Diddle some Dung up in the NHL I think. 30 goals are within his reach this year and he was a friggin throw in in the Dzingel trade lol
GM Hockey » The other NHL teams » General Hockey talk » General Hockey Talk - Injuries, signings, factoids + other news from around the league
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|