wprager wrote:St. Louis had over 8 minutes of PP time; Lcavalier over 7. Between the two of them they had two assists. Yet St. Louis is given the third star over Leclaire? Hell, give it to Frasier if you're going to do that.
Look, I'm not suggesting that Marty did not have a heck of a game, but if a forward plays over 8 minutes on the PP registering just a single assist, yet plays well enough to get 3rd star considerations, in a game that ends up 3-2 in OT, well, what about the winning goalie? If the winning goalie didn't deserve it then how in hell can the forward who gets 8+ minutes on the powerplay and only gets a single assist in the game? Either Leclaire didn't deserve it because Marty and Vinny were crap out there, or Marty didn't deserve it because he got outplayed by the 5th penaly killer -- Leclaire.
I only got to watch a tiny bit of the game; couldn't recrod it either. Saw the TSN highlights. So, yes, I'm trolling the stats only. So I can understand why Alfredsson, with just that garbage goal gets 1st star over Spezza's three-point night including the OT winner -- there are things the stats don't show. But in the case of St. Louis over Leclaire, I just don't understand how that can be. Unless St. Louis also played goal when he wasn't out on the PP.
Someone, please, explain it to me.
I was wondering how they were going to give out the 3 stars (Mel was sick and we had to leave).
I would have said:
1.Alfredsson
2.Spezza
3.St.Louis
Or a mix and match of Alfie and Spez. To see Alfie up close is to see him dominate that game from start to finish. Forget his goal, he was flying tonight. Amazing.
And St.Louis was doing the same. Every time he touched the puck something happened. Little monkey. He's a lock for Team Canada.