GM Hockey
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
GM Hockey

You are not connected. Please login or register

GAME DAY: Tampa Bay Lightning @ Ottawa Senators - 7:30pm EST - Thu. Nov. 5th, 2009

+16
Jordo
ddt
Sens19
Flo The Action
Hockeyhero22000
LeCaptain
smash88
M_Christopher
Riprock
jamvan
wprager
Cap'n Clutch
Hoags
PTFlea
asq2
shabbs
20 posters

Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 8, 9, 10, 11  Next

Go down  Message [Page 9 of 11]

PTFlea


Co-Founder
Co-Founder

wprager wrote:St. Louis had over 8 minutes of PP time; Lcavalier over 7. Between the two of them they had two assists. Yet St. Louis is given the third star over Leclaire? Hell, give it to Frasier if you're going to do that.

Look, I'm not suggesting that Marty did not have a heck of a game, but if a forward plays over 8 minutes on the PP registering just a single assist, yet plays well enough to get 3rd star considerations, in a game that ends up 3-2 in OT, well, what about the winning goalie? If the winning goalie didn't deserve it then how in hell can the forward who gets 8+ minutes on the powerplay and only gets a single assist in the game? Either Leclaire didn't deserve it because Marty and Vinny were crap out there, or Marty didn't deserve it because he got outplayed by the 5th penaly killer -- Leclaire.

I only got to watch a tiny bit of the game; couldn't recrod it either. Saw the TSN highlights. So, yes, I'm trolling the stats only. So I can understand why Alfredsson, with just that garbage goal gets 1st star over Spezza's three-point night including the OT winner -- there are things the stats don't show. But in the case of St. Louis over Leclaire, I just don't understand how that can be. Unless St. Louis also played goal when he wasn't out on the PP.

Someone, please, explain it to me.

I was wondering how they were going to give out the 3 stars (Mel was sick and we had to leave).

I would have said:

1.Alfredsson
2.Spezza
3.St.Louis

Or a mix and match of Alfie and Spez. To see Alfie up close is to see him dominate that game from start to finish. Forget his goal, he was flying tonight. Amazing.

And St.Louis was doing the same. Every time he touched the puck something happened. Little monkey. He's a lock for Team Canada.

shabbs


Hall of Famer
Hall of Famer

SeawaySensFan wrote:
wprager wrote:
This hit was perfect. It was shoulder to chest (not a head shot by any stretch), he didn't jump or even hit up, it was dead-on straight, there was no charge as he coasted in from the face off circle all the way behind the net.

I have absolutely no problems with hits like this one. To even begin to compare it against the Liambas hit is a travesty.

You pretty much described the Liambas hit right there, though.
I think there are some big differences in the mechanics of how it happened. Hedman didn't go into the boards, he just went backwards because the hit was straight on. That was not the case with the Liambas hit.

PTFlea


Co-Founder
Co-Founder

shabbs wrote:And from the "shut your trap" category... Downie sounds off on Neil's hit...

http://www.ottawasun.com/sports/hockey/2009/11/05/11652881.html

Ha ha. What a loser.

Holy cow that guy's an amazing loser. Diddle I wish we were winning 5-2 in the 3rd so we could have taken care of him once and for all.

PTFlea

PTFlea
Co-Founder
Co-Founder

Dash wrote:Zenon Konopka also commented on the hit saying 'if I was the commissioner, I would be making more money, but I would be taking a serious look at the hit'...

He also commented on the OHL hit, trying to compare the two.

Neil defended the hit saying he thought it was legal, never left his feet and even if he had he would not have hit Hedman in the head cause he is '8 feet tall'. Said it is his job to finish his checks and hopes Hedman is okay.

My thought - legal hit, perfectly acceptable. Too bad for Hedman - welcome to the NHL. Neil did everything he is supposed to do. He also did the right thing and fought that punk Wing Dang Doodle Downie.

Exactly. Welcome to the NHL, that's one of the reasons that Karlsson isn't here right now. There's a lot that can happen in a fraction of a second. 100% clean. Tampa Bay nerds need to stop whining.

PTFlea

PTFlea
Co-Founder
Co-Founder

SeawaySensFan wrote:
Vandelay wrote:
shabbs wrote:Damn I wish I was Mike Fisher...

GAME DAY: Tampa Bay Lightning @ Ottawa Senators - 7:30pm EST - Thu. Nov. 5th, 2009 - Page 9 1341074
Not that you'd be getting any, even if you were....edit: nevermind....too slow on the draw...

The one with the dark hair would look good with a riding crop and a choker.

Laughing3 Ahhhhh! Ahhhhh! Hilarious.

shabbs

shabbs
Hall of Famer
Hall of Famer

Latest Sens news from today:

From: http://twitter.com/NHL_Sens

Michalek and Volchenkov are not skating with the Sens today.

Lines at practice today: Shannon-Spezza-Alfredsson; Foligno-Fisher-Kovalev; Cheechoo-Regin-Neil; Ruutu-Kelly-Donovan-Winchester.

SensFan71


All-Star
All-Star

shabbs wrote:Latest Sens news from today:

From: http://twitter.com/NHL_Sens

Michalek and Volchenkov are not skating with the Sens today.

Lines at practice today: Shannon-Spezza-Alfredsson; Foligno-Fisher-Kovalev; Cheechoo-Regin-Neil; Ruutu-Kelly-Donovan-Winchester.

just a rest day for Michalek? he had a rough game last night, being hauled down a lot when he tried to turn on his jets.

shabbs

shabbs
Hall of Famer
Hall of Famer

Clouston post-practice presser from today:

http://senators.nhl.com/v2/ext/Audio/091106_Clouston.mp3

Vandelay

Vandelay
Sophomore
Sophomore

SpezDispenser wrote:
Dash wrote:Zenon Konopka also commented on the hit saying 'if I was the commissioner, I would be making more money, but I would be taking a serious look at the hit'...

He also commented on the OHL hit, trying to compare the two.

Neil defended the hit saying he thought it was legal, never left his feet and even if he had he would not have hit Hedman in the head cause he is '8 feet tall'. Said it is his job to finish his checks and hopes Hedman is okay.

My thought - legal hit, perfectly acceptable. Too bad for Hedman - welcome to the NHL. Neil did everything he is supposed to do. He also did the right thing and fought that punk Wing Dang Doodle Downie.

Exactly. Welcome to the NHL, that's one of the reasons that Karlsson isn't here right now. There's a lot that can happen in a fraction of a second. 100% clean. Tampa Bay nerds need to stop whining.

To T-bay's credit, Tocchet told the media after the game that he didn't see anything wrong with the hit, just a good clean hockey hit. I'm sure the players will shut their yaps once they realize their own coach didn't have anything bad to say about the hit.

SensFan71


All-Star
All-Star

I don't expect downie to ever shut his mouth, between his mouth and his brain, there are zero connections/synapses.

PTFlea

PTFlea
Co-Founder
Co-Founder

Vandelay wrote:
To T-bay's credit, Tocchet told the media after the game that he didn't see anything wrong with the hit, just a good clean hockey hit. I'm sure the players will shut their yaps once they realize their own coach didn't have anything bad to say about the hit.

Good on him then. He's been there, he knows what a good clean hit is and what's dirty.

shabbs

shabbs
Hall of Famer
Hall of Famer

SensFan71 wrote:I don't expect downie to ever shut his mouth, between his mouth and his brain, there are zero connections/synapses.
He has a brain?

wprager

wprager
Administrator
Administrator

SeawaySensFan wrote:
wprager wrote:
This hit was perfect. It was shoulder to chest (not a head shot by any stretch), he didn't jump or even hit up, it was dead-on straight, there was no charge as he coasted in from the face off circle all the way behind the net.

I have absolutely no problems with hits like this one. To even begin to compare it against the Liambas hit is a travesty.

You pretty much described the Liambas hit right there, though.

Liambas charged, plain and simple. Also the kid turned and Liambas hit him from behind. Now, I realize that hockey is a fast game and when someone turns like that the hit from behind cannot be avoided, but he still could (should) have pulled up, not followed through with extending his arms. And the kid should have had his helmet on better than that. It still would have been a charge but if Liambas, perhaps, lets up a little, no broken orbital bone (not charging in the first place helps in that respect as well). And, of course, the worst part of the injury is the fractured skull, which would not have happened if the helmet had stayed on.

Bottom line, Liambas' hit was charging and from behind. A suspension I understand, but a full year is way over the top. What if that had been Taylor Hall doing the charging?

The Neil hit was perfect.


_________________
Hey, I don't have all the answers. In life, to be honest, I've failed as much as I have succeeded. But I love my wife. I love my life. And I wish you my kind of success.
- Dicky Fox

SeawaySensFan

SeawaySensFan
Franchise Player
Franchise Player

Keith "Face Like a Frying Pan" Jones broke down the video of the Liambas hit in slow motion and he did indeed glide into that hit. It wasn't a charge.

As you pointed out, the helmet wasn't secured. Another instance where equipment played a role. This is usually the case as equipment is often used incorrectly as either a weapon or as nothing more than a fashion accessory.

jamvan

jamvan
Veteran
Veteran

Sens are teh second most penalized team in the league. If they can just change that stat alone, it will make the team even better.

They average 18.8 minutes a games, which is pretty much a full period a game.

PTFlea

PTFlea
Co-Founder
Co-Founder

jamvan wrote:Sens are teh second most penalized team in the league. If they can just change that stat alone, it will make the team even better.

They average 18.8 minutes a games, which is pretty much a full period a game.

Yeah, they need to bring that number way down and they'll start to get more and more dangerous.

wprager

wprager
Administrator
Administrator

SeawaySensFan wrote:Keith "Face Like a Frying Pan" Jones broke down the video of the Liambas hit in slow motion and he did indeed glide into that hit. It wasn't a charge.

As you pointed out, the helmet wasn't secured. Another instance where equipment played a role. This is usually the case as equipment is often used incorrectly as either a weapon or as nothing more than a fashion accessory.

He took about a dozen strides before he "glided" though. It was a charge. In my opinion.

The rule book, however, is very loosey-goosey:

Charging shall mean the actions of a player or goalkeeper who, as a result of distance traveled, shall violently check an opponent in any manner. A “charge” may be the result of a check into the boards, into the goal frame or in open ice.

No wonder there is no consistency between refs. It would appear that stiff checks are against the rules of the game


_________________
Hey, I don't have all the answers. In life, to be honest, I've failed as much as I have succeeded. But I love my wife. I love my life. And I wish you my kind of success.
- Dicky Fox

SeawaySensFan

SeawaySensFan
Franchise Player
Franchise Player

wprager wrote:He took about a dozen strides before he "glided" though. It was a charge. In my opinion.

The rule book, however, is very loosey-goosey:

No wonder there is no consistency between refs. It would appear that stiff checks are against the rules of the game

Fair enough. As long as we both agree that I'm right and that Keith Jones has a face like a frying pan.

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 9 of 11]

Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 8, 9, 10, 11  Next

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum