On it's own... it looks bad but if you quote the whole sentence... I think what he's saying becomes clear. Here is what he said:hemlock wrote:wprager wrote:You misunderstood what he said. They didn't jump at Montreal's offer (which, I believe, was for 3 years) and no-one else was offering a multi-year deal. In that context, Ottawa was his last chance at a multi-year deal. He never said it was his last choice.
I stand corrected, he did say they were his "last option" for a two year deal here:
http://www.faceoff.com/hockey/nhlnews/story.html?id=6d846c12-9d77-4e3d-97e9-9e5a3e0954a7&add_feed_url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.faceoff.com%2Fcolumnists.atom
Still doesn't change my point though that Ottawa is, never was, or never will be his first choice. To make him the Anti-Heatley in that regard is ridiculous.
“We couldn’t get any better offer from anybody else,” said Kovalev. “Ottawa was kind of the last choice for us. If we didn’t sign, we were going to end up someplace else for one year.”
To be honest, I think he meant to say "best choice" as he didn't want to be stuck in "someplace else" that would be worse than Ottawa.