GM Hockey
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
GM Hockey

You are not connected. Please login or register

Senators: Set on D? Forward Next?

+5
SeawaySensFan
SensFan71
shabbs
Phoenix30
davetherave
9 posters

Go to page : Previous  1, 2

Go down  Message [Page 2 of 2]

16Senators: Set on D? Forward Next? - Page 2 Empty Re: Senators: Set on D? Forward Next? Fri May 08, 2009 11:43 am

SensFan71


All-Star
All-Star

SeawaySensFan wrote:Rundblad is already 19, if that's who they're drafting. He might even have a leg up on Karlsson.

I wish I could see into Bryan Murray's head so I know who he is drafting, then I can stop running my mind a thousand miles a minute, thinking about possiblities and such, this is an important draft for this team going forward.

17Senators: Set on D? Forward Next? - Page 2 Empty Re: Senators: Set on D? Forward Next? Fri May 08, 2009 12:00 pm

wprager


Administrator
Administrator

Neely4Life wrote:Some people's expectations really are too high for Karlsson right now. The idea is to ease him into the NHL as a 5, 6 guy, give him some PP time and let him learn.

I'm of the opinion that the next step for the kid is the NHL and he is ready, but he isnt ready for 20-25 mins a night, while people expect him to be a stud at both ends of the rink. Lets jump back to reality here.

There are going to be growing pains with the kid and he will make mistakes, probably big ones (thank God we have Leclaire). Its great we signed him and we might have him here next year but that kid isnt going to make a real impact until he is 22, 23 years old, just like Wiercioch.

The D isnt "set" in Ottawa, its in good shape.

Would be fair to say, though, that it's "set enough" for a team that's not pretneding to be contending? I am confident that we had the stuff to make the playoffs, but as a 6-8 seed the chances of advancing even to the 2nd round would be slim (gone are the days of the #3 seed being easy pickings). With Karlsson under contract all I see is that we have even more D-men signed, which, at worst, gives us more flexibility and some trade stock. I Karlsson can play the 5/6 role that gives us the option of moving Lee and Picard. If Smith is on the LTIR or retires, then those combined contracts add up to $4.4M. There's a top-six right there. Or a top-4 D-man.

18Senators: Set on D? Forward Next? - Page 2 Empty Re: Senators: Set on D? Forward Next? Fri May 08, 2009 1:54 pm

davetherave


All-Star
All-Star

SeawaySensFan wrote:Rundblad is already 19, if that's who they're drafting. He might even have a leg up on Karlsson.

SSF's latest and most excellent avatar. The Electric Flag. Mike Bloomfield. Maybe the best blues-rock guitarist EVER.

And from Chicago.

19Senators: Set on D? Forward Next? - Page 2 Empty Re: Senators: Set on D? Forward Next? Fri May 08, 2009 1:59 pm

Hockeyhero22000

Hockeyhero22000
Veteran
Veteran

wprager wrote:
Neely4Life wrote:Some people's expectations really are too high for Karlsson right now. The idea is to ease him into the NHL as a 5, 6 guy, give him some PP time and let him learn.

I'm of the opinion that the next step for the kid is the NHL and he is ready, but he isnt ready for 20-25 mins a night, while people expect him to be a stud at both ends of the rink. Lets jump back to reality here.

There are going to be growing pains with the kid and he will make mistakes, probably big ones (thank God we have Leclaire). Its great we signed him and we might have him here next year but that kid isnt going to make a real impact until he is 22, 23 years old, just like Wiercioch.

The D isnt "set" in Ottawa, its in good shape.

Would be fair to say, though, that it's "set enough" for a team that's not pretneding to be contending? I am confident that we had the stuff to make the playoffs, but as a 6-8 seed the chances of advancing even to the 2nd round would be slim (gone are the days of the #3 seed being easy pickings). With Karlsson under contract all I see is that we have even more D-men signed, which, at worst, gives us more flexibility and some trade stock. I Karlsson can play the 5/6 role that gives us the option of moving Lee and Picard. If Smith is on the LTIR or retires, then those combined contracts add up to $4.4M. There's a top-six right there. Or a top-4 D-man.

i think you hit it on the head there we arent goign to be cup
contenders this year and if karlsson plays we have Kuba Karlsson
campoli volchenkov philips and numerous d who can play the lst slot i
think these are a good enough to start the season let karlsson do some
learning and let the guys get better i believe campoli is going to get
better too we may not be the best but we need to let the guys get better

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 2 of 2]

Go to page : Previous  1, 2

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum