Neely4Life wrote:Thats exactly it, and at 27 and a low cap hit, his value may never be higher than it is now.
IMHO Neely is correct in this respect...solid d-men like Volchenkov have tangible value, and there are more than a few teams who would welcome his combination of character and ability.
The available UFA pool continues to shrink and we are moving into the 'trading' part of the summer.
Bryan Murray may find himself among the GMs who decide on looking towards the future, rather than simply next season.
These GMs take the view that accumulating young, inexpensive talent means they have to forego short term success for the opportunity to build a strong team over the long term.
Dean Lombardi and John Davidson are two examples whose clubs are starting to emerge as a result.
The next few months will show us which GMs follow that philosophy; which ones have decided that spending now to go for the Cup is worth the risk; and which ones are somewhere in between.
Interesting how some observers praise Ken Holland for signing his stars to 'lifetime' deals (Zetterberg, Franzen et al) and then are 'surprised' when other GMs follow suit. Getting 'creative' with the cap is now part of the business...and a necessary one.
How many mid-range UFAs will remain unsigned? While about 50 deals were done over the last few days, I believe some 300 UFAs are on the market. We may see what NHLPA Director Paul Kelly meant when he called some players 'cap casualties'--players out of contract who can't find new homes--very soon.
Here's the updated UFA list from TSN:
http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/feature/?id=11850
TSN's Matt Cullen also has an article today that reviews a number of UFA signings, especially the less flashy ones.
http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/story/?id=283421
Are these players 'worth the money?' is always the question asked...but the answer is simply that the market dictates the price.
You either play the game, or you watch the others...
Is there a 'right' or 'wrong' way to build your team? The contrast between Pittsburgh and Detroit's approaches in winning their respective Stanley Cups, and what the previous winners, Anaheim and Carolina, have done since then, reveals that the answer is far more complex than most of us imagine.