Big Ev wrote:can we stop speculating a Spezza injury, the guy was at a funeral for Diddle sakes
Four injuries and a funeral, to be precise.
Gilroy is also at a funeral.
Big Ev wrote:can we stop speculating a Spezza injury, the guy was at a funeral for Diddle sakes
Big Ev wrote:can we stop speculating a Spezza injury, the guy was at a funeral for Diddle sakes
Big Ev wrote:can we stop speculating a Spezza injury, the guy was at a funeral for Diddle sakes
Big Ev wrote:and what is wrong with some people? I see some dickwad on HFBoards say Turris has been bad in all three zones? WTF are people actually watching? The guy has been creating offence and playing very responsible hockey. So what if he doesn't have points, he makes the team better and often has possession of the puck. Diddle sakes, people expect guys to come in and put up PPG or something before they can call them good players. Then you got the Gilroy haters. He's a 6th d-men for Diddle sakes, who cares. It makes me sick. End rant.
Big Ev wrote:and what is wrong with some people? I see some dickwad on HFBoards say Turris has been bad in all three zones? WTF are people actually watching? The guy has been creating offence and playing very responsible hockey. So what if he doesn't have points, he makes the team better and often has possession of the puck. Diddle sakes, people expect guys to come in and put up PPG or something before they can call them good players. Then you got the Gilroy haters. He's a 6th d-men for Diddle sakes, who cares. It makes me sick. End rant.
Big Ev wrote:and what is wrong with some people? I see some dickwad on HFBoards say Turris has been bad in all three zones? WTF are people actually watching? The guy has been creating offence and playing very responsible hockey. So what if he doesn't have points, he makes the team better and often has possession of the puck. Diddle sakes, people expect guys to come in and put up PPG or something before they can call them good players. Then you got the Gilroy haters. He's a 6th d-men for Diddle sakes, who cares. It makes me sick. End rant.
Michallica wrote:Big Ev wrote:and what is wrong with some people? I see some dickwad on HFBoards say Turris has been bad in all three zones? WTF are people actually watching? The guy has been creating offence and playing very responsible hockey. So what if he doesn't have points, he makes the team better and often has possession of the puck. Diddle sakes, people expect guys to come in and put up PPG or something before they can call them good players. Then you got the Gilroy haters. He's a 6th d-men for Diddle sakes, who cares. It makes me sick. End rant.
I'm left scratching my head at what I read everytime I go to HFboards. Sadly, I succumb and keep going back because there's more volume of sens chatter.
Pick up the slack you Montagooses!
tim1_2 wrote:Big Ev wrote:and what is wrong with some people? I see some dickwad on HFBoards say Turris has been bad in all three zones? WTF are people actually watching? The guy has been creating offence and playing very responsible hockey. So what if he doesn't have points, he makes the team better and often has possession of the puck. Diddle sakes, people expect guys to come in and put up PPG or something before they can call them good players. Then you got the Gilroy haters. He's a 6th d-men for Diddle sakes, who cares. It makes me sick. End rant.
The sooner you come to the realization that there's no point participating in forums like HFBoards, the sooner your life will improve.
SpezDispenser wrote:Michallica wrote:Big Ev wrote:and what is wrong with some people? I see some dickwad on HFBoards say Turris has been bad in all three zones? WTF are people actually watching? The guy has been creating offence and playing very responsible hockey. So what if he doesn't have points, he makes the team better and often has possession of the puck. Diddle sakes, people expect guys to come in and put up PPG or something before they can call them good players. Then you got the Gilroy haters. He's a 6th d-men for Diddle sakes, who cares. It makes me sick. End rant.
I'm left scratching my head at what I read everytime I go to HFboards. Sadly, I succumb and keep going back because there's more volume of sens chatter.
Pick up the slack you Montagooses!
I still avoid HF whenever I can, but sometimes I feel like chatting hockey and there is no one on here. Volume of people come and go on here, some months it's high, some low. Hopefully we can get a happy medium at some point.
sandysensfan wrote:Read this on another post..
Over the past 2 seasons.... a total of 12 games... the Sens have played the Leafs when it's the 2nd game of back-to-back for 11 of those 12 games... That's unbelievable..
Now what do you think of that? How can they schedule it like that... I thought they were computerized? No computer would do that.. sorry...
It will be very interesting to see what they do next season...
sandysensfan wrote:Read this on another post..
Over the past 2 seasons.... a total of 12 games... the Sens have played the Leafs when it's the 2nd game of back-to-back for 11 of those 12 games... That's unbelievable..
Now what do you think of that? How can they schedule it like that... I thought they were computerized? No computer would do that.. sorry...
It will be very interesting to see what they do next season...
shabbs wrote:The NHL nightmare: Sens/Winnipeg and Vancouver/Calgary in the semis of the Stanley Cup Playoffs.
Heh heh.
How flippin' awesome would that be?
wprager wrote:Just checked, and not a single one of the Leafs games against the Sens in 2010-11 was on the second of back-to-back nights.
Leafs against Bruins: 1 of 5 games the Leafs are playing back-to-back nights.
Leafs against Habs: 0 games (i.e. always rested)
Leafs against Sabres: 0 games
I'd say shenanigans.
Big Ev wrote:can we stop speculating a Spezza injury, the guy was at a funeral for Diddle sakes
GM Hockey » Ottawa Senators » GAME DAY -Toronto Maple Leafs @ Ottawa Senators, Saturday, Mar. 17, 2012
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum