Wow. The "do or die" teams came up empty...
Van-Chi will be an awesome first round match up.
Van-Chi will be an awesome first round match up.
Big Ev wrote:Hawks have no chance
shabbs wrote:Stars need a regulation or OT win.wprager wrote:shabbs wrote:Dallas and Minnesota tied at 3 after 2.
All they need is 1 point,but safe is death.
Chicago needed the single point...
Big Ev wrote:Hawks have no chance
tim1_2 wrote:Big Ev wrote:Hawks have no chance
I'm not sure how you can say that given the history. What's so different this year?
tim1_2 wrote:Big Ev wrote:Hawks have no chance
I'm not sure how you can say that given the history. What's so different this year?
Big Ev wrote:tim1_2 wrote:Big Ev wrote:Hawks have no chance
I'm not sure how you can say that given the history. What's so different this year?
Vancouver won the President's Trophy and the Hawks just barely made it? The Hawks haven't been the same team all year. They are a soft group.
Michallica wrote:Big Ev wrote:tim1_2 wrote:Big Ev wrote:Hawks have no chance
I'm not sure how you can say that given the history. What's so different this year?
Vancouver won the President's Trophy and the Hawks just barely made it? The Hawks haven't been the same team all year. They are a soft group.
Replace Vancouver with Washington, and Hawks with Habs. You taught me this Big Ev
You don't think that that's a significant amount of pressure?tim1_2 wrote:They are a soft group? They are certainly a different group than last year, but I wouldn't call them soft. If Crawford can continue to play well into the playoffs, then they have a shot.
There's a ton of pressure on Luongo, and not much on the Hawks (despite being the defending champs).
spader wrote:You don't think that that's a significant amount of pressure?tim1_2 wrote:They are a soft group? They are certainly a different group than last year, but I wouldn't call them soft. If Crawford can continue to play well into the playoffs, then they have a shot.
There's a ton of pressure on Luongo, and not much on the Hawks (despite being the defending champs).
Michallica wrote:For the ppl pulling for Kirk Muller to be coaching the senators, you should be hoping Montreal goes on bit of a run here. If they're ousted in the first round, is it unrealistic to expect JM to be fired and be replaced with Kirk Muller? I think not. And already JM isn't a Pierre Gauthier guy (although their history dating back to the sens might help Martin).
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|